Skip to content

Conversation

@Mr-Leshiy
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Related Pull Requests

Please confirm the following checks

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream module

…in` (#586)

* initial

* feat: provider

* feat: update chain

* feat: start_new_chain

* feat: merge validation result struct into cip509

* feat: exports

* feat: return new chain

* chore: return success object

* fix: older version

* feat: cat id in payload

* fix: new version

* chore: lintfix

* chore: remove persistent arguments

* tmp

* chore: complete moving to central module

* feat: ref fn

* chore: merge methods

* chore: minor

* feat: export modified chains

* chore: minor comment

* chore: rbac update logic

* chore: isolation

* chore: validation and lintfix

* docs: remove error doc

* chore: minor refactor

* fix: comments

* chore: validation function return

* Update rust/rbac-registration/src/providers.rs

Co-authored-by: Alex Pozhylenkov <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Pozhylenkov <[email protected]>
@Mr-Leshiy Mr-Leshiy added the draft Draft label Nov 7, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

📚 Docs Preview

The docs for this PR can be previewed at the following URL:

https://docs.dev.projectcatalyst.io/libs/feat/rbac

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Test Report | ${\color{lightgreen}Pass: 554/554}$ | ${\color{red}Fail: 0/554}$ |

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

draft Draft

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants