We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Intel Advanced Performance Extensions Revision 1.0" says,
p.256 9.1 CCMPSCC EVEX.LLZ.NP.MAP4.IGNORED 38 /r CCMPB {ND=1} r8/m8, r8, dfv
and
p.267 9.1.2 Description The ND bit is required to be set to 1,
so, I think EVEX.ND should be 1, but
CCMPB
PATTERN: EVV 0x38 VNP MAP4 MOD[0b11] MOD=3 REG[rrr] RM[nnn] ND=0 SCC2 VL128 mode64 ZEROING=0 EVAPX_SCC()
shows ND=0. Which is correct?
xed -version Copyright (C) 2022, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. XED version: [v2023.08.21] % xed -64 -d 624CA40839FE 624CA40839FE ICLASS: CCMPS CATEGORY: APX EXTENSION: APXEVEX IFORM: CCMPS_GPRv_GPRv_DFV_APX ISA_SET: APX_F ATTRIBUTES: SCALABLE SHORT: ccmps r30, r31, dfv4 # set ND=1 of Payload byte 3 % xed -64 -d 624CA41839FE 624CA41839FE ERROR: GENERAL_ERROR Could not decode at offset: 0x0 len: 6 PC: 0x0: [624CA41839FE]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please use "Intel Advanced Performance Extensions Revision 2.0" (Intel's SDM). The ND specification for CCMPscc instructions is updated to be set.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
"Intel Advanced Performance Extensions Revision 1.0" says,
and
so, I think EVEX.ND should be 1, but
CCMPB
shows ND=0.
Which is correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: