You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I currently own 3 Daikin ACs and get somehow through the day by throttling my requests and therefore never reaching the limit of 200 requests per day. I have already been in touch with the technical support of Daikin Germany and there are no plans to increase or remove the limit - not even if I would pay a monthly fee. They argue that the Daikins servers are already over their limit, which is the reason why even their own Onecta app got rate limited.
Now, my family plans to add 6 additional Daikin ACs and the question came up, why I don't just create 1 or 2 more accounts where I add those devices, totaling in 400 or 600 requests per day.
As of now, your plugin does not allow this and I would ask if it's possible to add that functionality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Very likely it would be possible but I have no plans to add this in the near future. I currently only have one account, so in order to test this I would need to change my home setup and figure out all the implications on the HA side. Feel free to open a pull request with the necessary changes and tests to add this support.
I currently own 3 Daikin ACs and get somehow through the day by throttling my requests and therefore never reaching the limit of 200 requests per day. I have already been in touch with the technical support of Daikin Germany and there are no plans to increase or remove the limit - not even if I would pay a monthly fee. They argue that the Daikins servers are already over their limit, which is the reason why even their own Onecta app got rate limited.
Now, my family plans to add 6 additional Daikin ACs and the question came up, why I don't just create 1 or 2 more accounts where I add those devices, totaling in 400 or 600 requests per day.
As of now, your plugin does not allow this and I would ask if it's possible to add that functionality.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: