Show and Tell: ORCH — terminal-first alternative for teams who prefer code over visual workflow builders #6575
oxgeneral
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hello, I see you're working on the FastGPT project. We have a multi-model API transfer service compatible with OpenAI formats, supporting GPT, Claude, Gemini, Kimi, and other models, suitable for developers to quickly integrate and reduce the cost of maintaining multiple models. If your project has API call requirements, I can give you some test credits to try it out. One-stop shop for large model APIs: https://xtokens.shop |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey FastGPT community 👋
FastGPT's visual workflow builder is great for teams that prefer a GUI. But for teams who live in the terminal and want to orchestrate AI agents via TypeScript code and CLI commands, I built ORCH — a CLI runtime for managing AI agent teams.
The use case:
Instead of drawing boxes in a UI, you define agent roles, assign tasks, and let the state machine handle coordination:
What ORCH provides:
todo → in_progress → review → done@oxgeneral/orchnpm packageFor FastGPT users: Do you have use cases where you want to trigger your FastGPT workflows from CLI scripts or CI/CD pipelines? I'm curious how teams integrate visual builders with their existing DevOps workflows.
GitHub: https://github.com/oxgeneral/ORCH
npm:
npm install -g @oxgeneral/orchBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions