Replies: 3 comments
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
+1, this is useful in agent memory. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'd like to call a vote on adding the necessary metadata fields to
TagContentsandBranchContents.A dedicated discussion for this proposal is here: #6361
The implementation PR is here: #6364
This thread is for voting only. Please keep detailed design discussion in #6361.
Proposal
This proposal updates the ref metadata stored in branch and tag files.
Specifically:
BranchContents.metadatabecomes a structured string-to-string mapTagContents.metadatabecomes a structured string-to-string mapmetadataremains backward-compatible and is treated as an empty mapTagContentsgainscreatedAtandupdatedAttimestampsThe changed spec would be like:
Branch metadata file
{ "parent_branch": "feature/base", "parent_version": 42, "create_at": 1712312312, "manifest_size": 4096, "metadata": { "owner": "search-team", "purpose": "experiments" } }Tag metadata file
Backward Compatibility
Motivation
This makes branch and tag metadata structured and extensible, and makes tag lifecycle metadata explicit in the format.
Vote
Please vote with one of the following:
If you vote -1, please include the blocking concern.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions