jump_label: Fix the fix, brown paper bags galore

Per the example of:

  !atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, 1)

the inverse was written as:

  atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0)

except of course, that while !old is only true for old == 0, old is
true for everything except old == 0.

Fix it to read:

  atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1

such that only the 1->0 transition returns true and goes on to disable
the keys.

Fixes: 83ab38e ("jump_label: Fix concurrency issues in static_key_slow_dec()")
Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Author: Peter Zijlstra

kernel/jump_label.c

@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void static_key_disable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
 	}
 
 	jump_label_lock();
-	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
+	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
 		jump_label_update(key);
 	jump_label_unlock();
 }
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
 		return;
 
 	guard(mutex)(&jump_label_mutex);
-	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
+	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
 		jump_label_update(key);
 	else
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!static_key_slow_try_dec(key));