diff --git a/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp b/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
index 345af32650624..25be23d64463e 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
@@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ class SrcSafetyAnalysis {
   }
 
   SrcState computeNext(const MCInst &Point, const SrcState &Cur) {
+    if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Point))
+      return Cur;
+
     SrcStatePrinter P(BC);
     LLVM_DEBUG({
       dbgs() << "  SrcSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext(";
@@ -704,6 +707,8 @@ class CFGUnawareSrcSafetyAnalysis : public SrcSafetyAnalysis,
     SrcState S = createEntryState();
     for (auto &I : BF.instrs()) {
       MCInst &Inst = I.second;
+      if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Inst))
+        continue;
 
       // If there is a label before this instruction, it is possible that it
       // can be jumped-to, thus conservatively resetting S. As an exception,
@@ -998,6 +1003,9 @@ class DstSafetyAnalysis {
   }
 
   DstState computeNext(const MCInst &Point, const DstState &Cur) {
+    if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Point))
+      return Cur;
+
     DstStatePrinter P(BC);
     LLVM_DEBUG({
       dbgs() << "  DstSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext(";
@@ -1165,6 +1173,8 @@ class CFGUnawareDstSafetyAnalysis : public DstSafetyAnalysis,
     DstState S = createUnsafeState();
     for (auto &I : llvm::reverse(BF.instrs())) {
       MCInst &Inst = I.second;
+      if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Inst))
+        continue;
 
       // If Inst can change the control flow, we cannot be sure that the next
       // instruction (to be executed in analyzed program) is the one processed
@@ -1355,6 +1365,9 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::findUnsafeUses(
   });
 
   iterateOverInstrs(BF, [&](MCInstReference Inst) {
+    if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Inst))
+      return;
+
     const SrcState &S = Analysis->getStateBefore(Inst);
 
     // If non-empty state was never propagated from the entry basic block
@@ -1418,6 +1431,9 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::findUnsafeDefs(
   });
 
   iterateOverInstrs(BF, [&](MCInstReference Inst) {
+    if (BC.MIB->isCFI(Inst))
+      return;
+
     const DstState &S = Analysis->getStateAfter(Inst);
 
     if (auto Report = shouldReportAuthOracle(BC, Inst, S))
diff --git a/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s b/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
index 61aa84377b88e..5aec945621987 100644
--- a/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
+++ b/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
@@ -329,6 +329,38 @@ auth_oracle:
 // PAUTH-EMPTY:
 // PAUTH-NEXT:   Attaching leakage info to:     00000000:      autia   x0, x1 # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>
 
+// Gadget scanner should not crash on CFI instructions, including when debug-printing them.
+// Note that the particular debug output is not checked, but BOLT should be
+// compiled with assertions enabled to support -debug-only argument.
+
+        .globl  cfi_inst_df
+        .type   cfi_inst_df,@function
+cfi_inst_df:
+        .cfi_startproc
+        sub     sp, sp, #16
+        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+        add     sp, sp, #16
+        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
+        ret
+        .size   cfi_inst_df, .-cfi_inst_df
+        .cfi_endproc
+
+        .globl  cfi_inst_nocfg
+        .type   cfi_inst_nocfg,@function
+cfi_inst_nocfg:
+        .cfi_startproc
+        sub     sp, sp, #16
+        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+
+        adr     x0, 1f
+        br      x0
+1:
+        add     sp, sp, #16
+        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
+        ret
+        .size   cfi_inst_nocfg, .-cfi_inst_nocfg
+        .cfi_endproc
+
 // CHECK-LABEL:Analyzing function main, AllocatorId = 1
         .globl  main
         .type   main,@function