The list crosses categories and is not well differentiated/grouped.
For example, Semantic Trees and Semtrex seem to be particular portions of the technology, whereas Semantic Alternation is more a description of how semantic trees are structured, Match Triggers is very technically detailed, and Optimized for Evolution is much more general. We should use header levels to group these and differentiate.
Additionally probably "Optimized for Evolution" should probably be the First item, not the last, as this is the aspect of P3 that makes it's stand-alone potential clear. Maybe even pushed to "purpose."
The list crosses categories and is not well differentiated/grouped.
For example, Semantic Trees and Semtrex seem to be particular portions of the technology, whereas Semantic Alternation is more a description of how semantic trees are structured, Match Triggers is very technically detailed, and Optimized for Evolution is much more general. We should use header levels to group these and differentiate.
Additionally probably "Optimized for Evolution" should probably be the First item, not the last, as this is the aspect of P3 that makes it's stand-alone potential clear. Maybe even pushed to "purpose."