-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Asm equivalence checker should handle: (neg 64, [9]) ≠ (slice 0 64, [(negZ, [9])]) #2050
Comments
Example (remove the extra newline and click synthesize again) I see
But we have fiat-crypto/src/Assembly/Symbolic.v Lines 2449 to 2455 in df1aa70
which seems like it should be triggering on the RHS (PHOAS)... |
Plausibly the issue is that nodes are not revealed enough, and we should be revealing nodes before (or after) running rewriting passes |
JasonGross
added a commit
to JasonGross/fiat-crypto
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Replaces mit-plv#2055 Closes mit-plv#2055 Fixes mit-plv#2050
JasonGross
added a commit
to JasonGross/fiat-crypto
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Replaces mit-plv#2055 Closes mit-plv#2055 Fixes mit-plv#2050
JasonGross
added a commit
to JasonGross/fiat-crypto
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
Replaces mit-plv#2055 Closes mit-plv#2055 Fixes mit-plv#2050
JasonGross
added a commit
to JasonGross/fiat-crypto
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
Replaces mit-plv#2055 Closes mit-plv#2055 Fixes mit-plv#2050
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: