Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make IMcpServer work well for single and multi-client scenarios #90

Open
halter73 opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Make IMcpServer work well for single and multi-client scenarios #90

halter73 opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@halter73
Copy link
Contributor

halter73 commented Mar 24, 2025

@halter73, @PederHP, I understand there's more work to be done around:

  • Making IMcpServer work well for 1:1 and many:1 transports
  • Moving the ASP.NET-based support into the libraries

Are those tracked by this issue, or can this be considered closed, given that @PederHP merged the initial SSE implementation?

Originally posted by @stephentoub in #45

We've already added server-side SSE transports as requested by #45 in the form of SseResponseStreamTransport and HttpListenerSseServerTransport, but we have not yet figured out the best API shape to support both single client and multi-client scenarios.

We will likely want a separate ASP.NET Core specific package to handle multiple concurrent clients as suggested by #42, but that isn't strictly required to address this issue.

@halter73 halter73 changed the title Make IMcpServer work well for 1:1 and many:1 transports Make IMcpServer work well for single and multi-client scenarios Mar 24, 2025
@normj
Copy link

normj commented Mar 27, 2025

At AWS we have a library that allows deploying ASP.NET Core base applications as AWS Lambda functions for.a serverless scenario. If this package was using ASP.NET Core as the HTTP backend instead of HttpListener we would should be able to deploy a .NET MCP server using this library as a serverless application on AWS Lambda.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants