[Bug]:

[Dimylka]

NetBox access-list plugin version

v1.3.0

NetBox version

v.3.5.2

Steps to Reproduce

Hi! (sorry for my bad english)
I've got some proplems with plugin by API
Fist of all i've created host "Webmin" by netbox web interface

Then i've created ACL "Webmin_ACL" by netbox API and attach them to host "Webmin"
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Token ********" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" https://netbox.local/api/plugins/access-lists/access-lists/ --data '{"name": "Webmin_ACL", "display": "Webmin_ACL", "assigned_object_type": "virtualization.virtualmachine", "assigned_object_id": 1, "type": "extended" }'

ACL "Webmin_ACL" was created with id "access_list": 7

Then i've tried to create ACL Extended Rule by netbox API
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Token *******" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" https://netbox.local/api/plugins/access-lists/extended-acl-rules/ --data '{"access_list": 7, "index": 1, "action": "permit", "destination_ports": [100]}'

But got error
"destination_ports": [
"Action is set to remark, Destination Ports CANNOT be set."
]

Query whithout "destination_ports": [100] will create ACL Extended Rule normally
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Token ********" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" https://netbox.local/api/plugins/access-lists/extended-acl-rules/ --data '{"access_list": 7, "index": 1, "action": "deny"}'

Please tell me what am i doing wrong?

Expected Behavior

ACL Extended Rule with "destination_ports" will created normally

Observed Behavior

"destination_ports": [
"Action is set to remark, Destination Ports CANNOT be set."
]

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening this Issue! We really appreciate the feedback & testing from users like you!

[Dimylka]

I've disabled "Remark" check at /opt/netbox/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/netbox_acls/api/serializers.py after that it works!

[cs-1]

The bug is the one found here: #190 A colleague of mine created a pull request to fix this.

[jsenecal]

Closing as duplicate of #190 which has better documentation