Batch 10

Author: MrHinsh

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -1021,12 +1021,15 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:31",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:26",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content provides a solution to customize UI colors, and briefly mentions that readers can inherit from a ToolStrip and change the renderer in case of problems, which aligns it with troubleshooting to a degree.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on customising UI elements in Windows Forms .NET, with a brief mention of troubleshooting by suggesting that if problems arise, one can inherit from the ToolStrip control and change the renderer. However, the main focus is on implementation rather than diagnosing or resolving technical issues, which limits its alignment with the troubleshooting category.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Azure Boards": {
     "category": "Azure Boards",
@@ -1120,12 +1123,15 @@
   },
   "System Configuration": {
     "category": "System Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:31",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:44",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 5,
+    "ai_alignment": 15,
+    "ai_depth": 12,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses customizing UI elements in Windows Forms, which involves some configuration of the graphical interface, but it is primarily focused on the implementation rather than broader system configuration practices.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on customising the UI colour scheme for Windows Forms in .NET, which is more related to software development and UI design rather than system configuration. While it does touch on aspects of configuration (like setting a custom renderer), it lacks depth in discussing broader system configuration practices, methodologies, or optimisation strategies. The technical details provided are specific to UI customisation rather than the overall system setup or performance enhancement.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Lean Thinking": {
     "category": "Lean Thinking",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -850,12 +850,15 @@
   },
   "Pragmatic Thinking": {
     "category": "Pragmatic Thinking",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:32",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:41",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses practical problem-solving techniques related to the Composite UI Application Block and how to implement a ToolStripPanel UI Adapter. It provides specific code implementations and discusses real-world application of adapting existing components to enhance functionality.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on a technical implementation of a UI adapter within the Composite UI Application Block (CAB). While it does touch on practical problem-solving by discussing two approaches to extend functionality, it lacks a broader discussion on Agile, Scrum, or DevOps principles. The depth of the technical details is significant, but the overall alignment with the core themes of pragmatic thinking is limited, as it does not address adaptability or real-world applications in a project management context.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "MVP": {
     "category": "MVP",
@@ -868,11 +871,14 @@
   },
   "Technical Mastery": {
     "category": "Technical Mastery",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:32",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:23",
+    "ai_confidence": 78.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15,
+    "ai_alignment": 32,
+    "ai_depth": 30,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses code implementation and adaptation techniques within a specific software framework (CAB) and includes best practices for creating UI adapters, which aligns closely with software craftsmanship and engineering practices.",
+    "final_score": 70.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content provides a detailed discussion on implementing a specific technical solution within the Composite UI Application Block (CAB), focusing on extending functionality through code. It explicitly mentions best practices in software design, such as inheritance and factory patterns, which align with the principles of clean code and software craftsmanship. The depth of the discussion is significant, as it includes code examples and explanations of the implementation process, demonstrating a strong grasp of technical concepts. However, it lacks broader discussions on topics like testing, continuous integration, or technical debt management, which slightly lowers the overall confidence score.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Working Agreements": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/index.md

@@ -27,10 +27,9 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /blog/adding-toolstrippanel-ui-adapter-support-to-the-composite-ui-application-block
 - /resources/blog/hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block
 tags:
-- Pragmatic Thinking
 - Software Development
-- Technical Mastery
 - Practical Techniques and Tooling
+- Technical Mastery
 categories: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -433,12 +433,15 @@
   },
   "Working Software": {
     "category": "Working Software",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:28",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:38",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses evaluating WCF (Windows Communication Foundation), highlighting its features and potential for web service projects, which relates to the delivery of functional software. However, the focus is more on the evaluation process rather than on working software characteristics or practices specifically.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 30.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and its potential benefits for web service projects, which aligns with the concept of working software. However, it lacks explicit discussions on Agile or Scrum principles, and the focus is more on the technology itself rather than on delivering functional software that meets user needs. The depth of discussion is moderate, providing some insights into the features and advantages of WCF, but it does not delve deeply into best practices or customer feedback mechanisms.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Lead Time": {
     "category": "Lead Time",
@@ -541,12 +544,15 @@
   },
   "Windows": {
     "category": "Windows",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:28",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:20",
+    "ai_confidence": 62.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 12.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 50,
-    "final_score": 50.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses Windows Communication Foundation (WCF), which is related to the Windows operating system and its .NET Framework components. While WCF is significant in Windows development, the broader focus on evaluating WCF suggests that Windows is a major but secondary theme in this discussion.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 61.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses Windows Communication Foundation (WCF), which is related to the Windows environment, but it primarily focuses on the evaluation of WCF as a technology rather than on Windows itself. While there are mentions of Windows Vista and the .NET Framework, the discussion does not delve deeply into installation, configuration, or troubleshooting of the Windows operating system. The content is more about software development and its implications rather than providing insights on managing or utilising the Windows OS.",
+    "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Agile Planning Tools": {
     "category": "Agile Planning Tools",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/index.md

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /resources/blog/windows-communication-framework-evaluation
 tags:
 - Software Development
+- Windows
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-11-net-framework-3-0/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -229,11 +229,14 @@
   },
   "Practical Techniques and Tooling": {
     "category": "Practical Techniques and Tooling",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:23:16",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:33",
+    "ai_confidence": 55.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 30.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 40.0,
+    "ai_depth": 60.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the application of .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, highlighting improvements in developer productivity and code quality, which aligns with practical techniques and tooling, but it is not the primary focus.",
+    "final_score": 50.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the practical application of .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, highlighting improvements in developer productivity and code quality. While it mentions specific tools and their benefits, the discussion lacks depth in methodologies or frameworks related to Agile or DevOps practices, which are central to the category. The focus is more on the tool itself rather than its integration into broader Agile or DevOps contexts.",
     "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Application Lifecycle Management": {
@@ -337,11 +340,14 @@
   },
   "Products and Books": {
     "category": "Products and Books",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:23:34",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:17",
+    "ai_confidence": 62.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 12.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content mentions a book on Indigo and discusses the applications of .NET Framework 3.0, indicating a secondary theme related to products and tools, but the primary focus is on the framework itself.",
+    "final_score": 57.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content mentions a book on Indigo, which relates to the category, but the primary focus is on the .NET Framework 3.0 and its applications rather than a detailed discussion of products or literature. While there is some alignment with the themes of productivity and software tools, the depth of discussion is limited, focusing more on personal experience rather than a comprehensive review or analysis.",
     "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Miscellaneous": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-18-windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -688,11 +688,14 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:46:53",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:30",
+    "ai_confidence": 68.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 18.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses steps to troubleshoot the installation and functionality of Windows Mobile Device Center on Windows Vista, including updates and manual downloads, which aligns with the identification and resolution of a technical issue.",
+    "final_score": 61.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses a specific issue related to getting the Windows Mobile Device Center running on Windows Vista, which aligns with troubleshooting software problems. However, the discussion is brief and lacks depth, primarily focusing on a workaround rather than a comprehensive troubleshooting methodology. The mention of a failed update attempt provides some insight into diagnosing the issue, but overall, the content does not delve deeply into systematic problem-solving or broader troubleshooting strategies.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Scrum Team": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-18-windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center/index.md

@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /resources/blog/windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center
 tags:
 - Windows
-- Troubleshooting
 - Install and Configuration
+- Troubleshooting
 categories: []
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-20-installing-visual-studio-2005-on-windows-vista/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -688,12 +688,15 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:46:51",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:27",
+    "ai_confidence": 55.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 30.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 40.0,
+    "ai_depth": 50.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses issues encountered during the installation of Visual Studio 2005 on Windows Vista, indicating it addresses troubleshooting related to software installation errors.",
-    "level": "Secondary"
+    "final_score": 50.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content mentions installation errors, which aligns with troubleshooting, but lacks detailed discussion on diagnosing or resolving these issues. The focus is more on the experience rather than systematic problem-solving techniques.",
+    "level": "Tertiary"
   },
   "Scrum Team": {
     "category": "Scrum Team",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-20-installing-visual-studio-2005-on-windows-vista/index.md

@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /resources/blog/installing-visual-studio-2005-on-windows-vista
 tags:
 - Windows
-- Troubleshooting
 - Install and Configuration
 preview: metro-visual-studio-2005-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-22-rddotnet-project-created/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -463,12 +463,15 @@
   },
   "System Configuration": {
     "category": "System Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:27",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:25",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses aspects of system services configuration and extensibility, which relates to system configuration practices, making it a major theme; however, the main focus is on project creation and service definitions, which detracts from its classification as a primary topic.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 30.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the creation of a new project and its features, with only brief mentions of configuration aspects related to extensibility and service connections. While there are elements that touch on system configuration, such as the mention of a 'simple one line config section', the overall focus is more on project development and service features rather than in-depth discussions on system configuration methodologies or best practices.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Acceptance Test Driven Development": {
     "category": "Acceptance Test Driven Development",
@@ -508,12 +511,15 @@
   },
   "Working Software": {
     "category": "Working Software",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:27",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:14",
+    "ai_confidence": 42.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 30.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the creation of a new software project with various services, indicating an intent to deliver functional software. However, it lacks a focus on specific practices or principles related to Agile or Scrum methodologies that would elevate it to a clearer discussion of working software.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 39.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the creation of a new project and outlines various services that will be developed, which indicates a focus on software development. However, it lacks explicit discussions on working software principles, quality assurance, or customer feedback mechanisms. The mention of extensibility and service functionality aligns somewhat with the category, but the overall depth and focus on delivering functional software are limited.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Continuous Learning": {
     "category": "Continuous Learning",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-ahhh-the-fun-of-deploying-team-system-in-a-large-corporation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -229,21 +229,27 @@
   },
   "Practical Techniques and Tooling": {
     "category": "Practical Techniques and Tooling",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:08:56",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:22",
+    "ai_confidence": 72.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 22.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 73.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content primarily discusses the practical deployment of Team Foundation Server (TFS) within a corporate environment, including specific techniques and resources for overcoming access issues and managing database transfers.",
+    "final_score": 66.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses deploying Team Foundation Server (TFS) and provides a practical workaround for database access issues, which aligns with the category's focus on practical techniques and tooling. However, the discussion lacks depth and does not cover broader Agile or DevOps methodologies or frameworks, limiting its overall alignment with the category.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Application Lifecycle Management": {
     "category": "Application Lifecycle Management",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:08:58",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:11",
+    "ai_confidence": 42.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 30.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses deploying Team Foundation Server (TFS), which is related to application lifecycle management, but the primary focus is on the deployment process rather than the broader aspects of ALM.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 38.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the deployment of Team Foundation Server (TFS) within a corporate environment, which is a specific aspect of the application lifecycle. However, it lacks a comprehensive discussion on the broader stages of the application lifecycle, governance, or best practices. While it mentions ALM in the tags, the main focus is on a practical deployment issue rather than a thorough exploration of application lifecycle management principles.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Complexity Thinking": {
     "category": "Complexity Thinking",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-ahhh-the-fun-of-deploying-team-system-in-a-large-corporation/index.md

@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ aliasesArchive:
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 tags:
-- Practical Techniques and Tooling
 - System Configuration
 - Install and Configuration
+- Practical Techniques and Tooling
 - Software Development
 - Troubleshooting
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-visual-studio-sp1-and-team-system-sp1-are-released/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -544,12 +544,15 @@
   },
   "Software Development": {
     "category": "Software Development",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:09:22",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:20",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 25.0,
+    "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content mentions Team Foundation Server (TFS), which is related to software development and project management, but does not primarily discuss specific software development methodologies, practices, or techniques.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 29.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions Visual Studio and Team Foundation Server, which are tools used in software development, but it lacks a detailed discussion on methodologies, practices, or frameworks. The focus is more on the release and personal anticipation rather than on software development processes or best practices.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Test First Development": {
     "category": "Test First Development",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-12-15-visual-studio-sp1-and-team-system-sp1-are-released/index.md

@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 tags:
 - News and Reviews
-- Software Development
 
 ---
 I have been waiting for this for a while and [Brian Harry](http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/) has some comments and notes on the topic. I will be installing this as soon as its mammoth 450mb download completes.