Batch 06

Author: MrHinsh

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-ahaaaa/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -325,11 +325,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:19:02",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:33",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content does not discuss Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks; it is primarily about a personal issue with posting code.",
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content does not mention Scrum or any related concepts, roles, events, or principles. It appears to be a personal reflection on posting issues rather than a discussion on Scrum.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {
@@ -1009,12 +1012,15 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T16:38:34",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions a problem with posting code, indicating troubleshooting efforts, but it does not provide systematic methodologies or solutions related to technical issues.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:35",
+    "ai_confidence": 25.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 10.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 20.0,
+    "ai_depth": 10.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 22.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions a problem related to posting code, which aligns with troubleshooting. However, it lacks detailed discussion on diagnosing or resolving the issue, and does not provide methodologies or insights typical of the troubleshooting category.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Azure Boards": {
     "category": "Azure Boards",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-ahaaaa/index.md

@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /ahaaaa-
 - /blog/ahaaaa-
 - /resources/blog/ahaaaa
-tags:
-- Troubleshooting
+tags: []
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -82,12 +82,15 @@
   },
   "Install and Configuration": {
     "category": "Install and Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:15:06",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:40",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 10,
+    "ai_alignment": 25,
+    "ai_depth": 15,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content provides a guide on customising UI elements in a .NET application, which relates to configuration, but it is primarily focused on implementation details rather than a broader installation or configuration process.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 30.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content provides a code snippet for customising the UI colour scheme in Windows Forms .NET, which relates to configuration aspects. However, it lacks a comprehensive discussion on installation procedures or broader configuration best practices. The focus is primarily on a specific implementation detail rather than a step-by-step guide or troubleshooting advice, leading to a lower confidence score.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Market Adaptability": {
     "category": "Market Adaptability",
@@ -325,11 +328,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:15:57",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content is focused on customising UI elements in .NET and does not discuss Scrum principles, roles, events, or practices.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:37",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content focuses entirely on customising UI elements in .NET and does not mention Scrum or any related concepts. There is no discussion of Scrum roles, events, or principles, making it irrelevant to the category.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -64,12 +64,15 @@
   },
   "Code and Complexity": {
     "category": "Code and Complexity",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:16:39",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:29",
+    "ai_confidence": 32.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 10,
+    "ai_alignment": 25,
+    "ai_depth": 15,
     "non_ai_confidence": 20,
-    "final_score": 47.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the implementation of a UI adapter in a specific framework, which involves code quality and design decisions. However, it does not deeply explore the complexities or principles of software development processes, making it a secondary theme.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 31.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on implementing a specific feature in a software framework, detailing code examples and implementation strategies. While it touches on aspects of code quality and maintainability through the discussion of factory patterns and inheritance, it lacks a broader exploration of complexity theory or its implications on software architecture. The discussion is more technical and practical rather than theoretical, which limits its alignment with the core themes of the 'Code and Complexity' category.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "DevOps": {
     "category": "DevOps",
@@ -325,11 +328,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:17:35",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses technical implementation details related to the Composite UI Application Block and does not address Scrum principles, roles, events, or practices.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:25",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 5.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on technical implementation details related to the Composite UI Application Block and does not mention Scrum principles, roles, events, or any related concepts. There is minimal conceptual alignment with Scrum, as it does not discuss team dynamics, iterative processes, or continuous improvement, which are core to the Scrum framework.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-01-cafemsn-prize/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -262,11 +262,14 @@
   },
   "Miscellaneous": {
     "category": "Miscellaneous",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:14:10",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses a personal experience related to winning a prize, which does not align with specific Agile, Scrum, DevOps, or Lean frameworks.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:18",
+    "ai_confidence": 72.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 10.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 80.0,
+    "ai_depth": 60.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 65.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses a personal experience related to winning a voucher, which does not connect to Agile, Scrum, DevOps, or Lean principles. While it does not explicitly mention the category, it fits within the Miscellaneous theme as it is a personal anecdote that lacks actionable insights or relevance to established frameworks. The depth of discussion is moderate, focusing on a singular event without broader implications.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Organisational Agility": {
@@ -325,11 +328,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:14:19",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content is primarily about winning a prize and does not discuss Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:16",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content does not mention Scrum or any related concepts, roles, or practices. It focuses on a personal achievement unrelated to project management or Agile methodologies.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-02-the-most-usefull-net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -316,20 +316,26 @@
   },
   "Products and Books": {
     "category": "Products and Books",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:12:56",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:14",
+    "ai_confidence": 25.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 10.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 20.0,
+    "ai_depth": 10.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content mentions a specific .NET tool, Reflector, which aligns with discussions on tools pertinent to Agile methodologies and DevOps practices, but lacks detailed analysis or review.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 22.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions a .NET tool, Reflector, but lacks detailed discussion or analysis related to Agile methodologies or DevOps practices. It does not provide insights, reviews, or comparisons that would align with the core themes of the category.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:12:58",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content is primarily focused on a .NET tool and does not discuss Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:11",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content does not mention Scrum or any related concepts. It focuses solely on a .NET tool, which is unrelated to Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-02-the-most-usefull-net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet/index.md

@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /the-most-usefull--net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet-
 - /blog/the-most-usefull--net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet-
 - /resources/blog/the-most-usefull-net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet
-tags:
-- Products and Books
+tags: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -100,12 +100,15 @@
   },
   "News and Reviews": {
     "category": "News and Reviews",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:11:13",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:09",
+    "ai_confidence": 42.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 35.0,
+    "ai_depth": 30.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 46.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and its implications for web service projects, which aligns with technology updates. However, it lacks broader industry news or reviews, making it a secondary theme.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "final_score": 39.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and its implications for web service projects, which aligns with technology updates. However, it lacks explicit references to industry news or reviews, focusing more on personal evaluation and recommendations. The depth of discussion is moderate, providing insights into WCF's features but not enough to classify it as a comprehensive review or news piece.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Agile Product Operating Model": {
     "category": "Agile Product Operating Model",
@@ -325,11 +328,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:11:52",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content primarily discusses Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and related technologies, with no mention of Scrum principles, roles, events, or practices.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:06",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 5.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and does not mention Scrum or its principles, roles, events, or artifacts. There is no alignment with Scrum concepts, and the depth of discussion is focused on WCF technology rather than any Scrum-related topics.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-09-08-web-2-0/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -262,11 +262,14 @@
   },
   "Miscellaneous": {
     "category": "Miscellaneous",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:10:38",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 72.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the concept of Web 2.0, which does not align with specific Agile, Scrum, DevOps, or Lean frameworks, making it a suitable fit for the Miscellaneous category.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:04",
+    "ai_confidence": 72.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 15,
+    "ai_alignment": 30,
+    "ai_depth": 25,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 65.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content discusses the concept of 'Web 2.0' in a general manner without delving into specific Agile, Scrum, DevOps, or Lean frameworks. It reflects on the buzzword nature of 'Web 2.0' in a business context, which aligns with the Miscellaneous category. However, it lacks depth in exploring broader implications or providing actionable insights, resulting in a moderate confidence score.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Organisational Agility": {
@@ -325,11 +328,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T11:10:49",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content primarily discusses Web 2.0 and does not relate to Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:01",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content does not discuss Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks. It focuses on the concept of Web 2.0, which is unrelated to Scrum, and does not mention any Scrum roles, events, or artifacts.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Sociotechnical Systems": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-10-31-codeplex-project-rddotnet-white-label/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -64,11 +64,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:23:49",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content does not discuss Scrum principles, practices, or frameworks; it focuses on a codeplex project without any mention of Scrum.",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:27:58",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content does not mention Scrum or its principles, roles, events, or any related topics. It focuses solely on a codeplex project without any discussion of project management frameworks or methodologies.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Flow Efficiency": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-11-net-framework-3-0/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -64,11 +64,14 @@
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:22:50",
-    "ai_confidence": 0,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:27:55",
+    "ai_confidence": 5.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 0,
+    "ai_alignment": 10.0,
+    "ai_depth": 5.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 0.0,
-    "reasoning": "Content primarily discusses .NET Framework 3.0 and its features, with no mention of Scrum principles, roles, or practices.",
+    "final_score": 4.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on the .NET Framework and its features, with no direct mentions of Scrum principles, roles, or practices. While there is a brief mention of productivity, it does not align with the core themes of Scrum or provide any depth on Scrum-related topics.",
     "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Flow Efficiency": {
@@ -91,12 +94,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Excellence": {
     "category": "Technical Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:22:55",
-    "ai_confidence": 50,
-    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
-    "final_score": 45.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content discusses the benefits of using .NET Framework 3.0 and WCF, highlighting improvements in code quality and developer productivity, which are relevant to technical excellence. However, it does not delve deeply into specific engineering practices or methodologies.",
-    "level": "Tertiary"
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:27:57",
+    "ai_confidence": 45.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 20.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 40.0,
+    "ai_depth": 30.0,
+    "non_ai_confidence": 0,
+    "final_score": 40.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content mentions the .NET Framework 3.0 and its impact on developer productivity, which aligns with the principles of technical excellence. However, it lacks a detailed discussion on specific engineering practices or methodologies such as TDD or CI/CD. The focus is more on personal experience and benefits rather than a structured exploration of technical excellence concepts.",
+    "level": "Quaternary"
   },
   "Azure DevOps": {
     "category": "Azure DevOps",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-18-windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -10,11 +10,14 @@
   },
   "Install and Configuration": {
     "category": "Install and Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-02-17T10:20:45",
-    "ai_confidence": 80,
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:27:53",
+    "ai_confidence": 75.0,
+    "ai_mentions": 60.0,
+    "ai_alignment": 80.0,
+    "ai_depth": 70.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
-    "final_score": 73.0,
-    "reasoning": "The content primarily discusses the installation process of Windows Mobile Device Center on Windows Vista, providing specific instructions and updates related to the installation, which aligns well with the category.",
+    "final_score": 68.0,
+    "reasoning": "The content explicitly discusses the installation process of the Windows Mobile Device Center on Windows Vista, which aligns well with the category of Install and Configuration. It provides specific instructions on obtaining the beta version and mentions troubleshooting steps related to Windows updates. The focus is primarily on the technical aspects of installation, which is a core theme of the category. However, the depth of discussion could be improved with more detailed steps or configuration best practices.",
     "level": "Secondary"
   },
   "Decision Theory": {

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-11-18-windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center/index.md

@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /resources/blog/windows-vista-windows-mobile-device-center
 tags:
 - Windows
-- Install and Configuration
 - Troubleshooting
+- Install and Configuration
 categories: []
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png