Apply updated to ♻️ ClassificationHelpers.ps1, HugoHelpers.ps1, Update-ClassisificationFrontMatter.ps1, Update-ReourcesFrontMatter.ps1 ro system

Author: MrHinsh

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-ahaaaa/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -1012,15 +1012,15 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:35",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 25.0,
     "ai_mentions": 10.0,
     "ai_alignment": 20.0,
     "ai_depth": 10.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 22.0,
     "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions a problem related to posting code, which aligns with troubleshooting. However, it lacks detailed discussion on diagnosing or resolving the issue, and does not provide methodologies or insights typical of the troubleshooting category.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Azure Boards": {
     "category": "Azure Boards",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -82,15 +82,15 @@
   },
   "Install and Configuration": {
     "category": "Install and Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:40",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 10,
     "ai_alignment": 25,
     "ai_depth": 15,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
     "final_score": 30.0,
     "reasoning": "The content provides a code snippet for customising the UI colour scheme in Windows Forms .NET, which relates to configuration aspects. However, it lacks a comprehensive discussion on installation procedures or broader configuration best practices. The focus is primarily on a specific implementation detail rather than a step-by-step guide or troubleshooting advice, leading to a lower confidence score.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Market Adaptability": {
     "category": "Market Adaptability",
@@ -865,15 +865,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Mastery": {
     "category": "Technical Mastery",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:21",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 42.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 35.0,
     "ai_depth": 30.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 38.0,
     "reasoning": "The content provides a practical example of customising UI elements in Windows Forms using .NET, which touches on software craftsmanship and design principles. However, it lacks a broader discussion on best practices, principles of clean code, or methodologies that contribute to high-quality software development. The focus is primarily on implementation rather than a comprehensive exploration of technical mastery.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Working Agreements": {
     "category": "Working Agreements",
@@ -1021,15 +1021,15 @@
   },
   "Troubleshooting": {
     "category": "Troubleshooting",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T12:19:26",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on customising UI elements in Windows Forms .NET, with a brief mention of troubleshooting by suggesting that if problems arise, one can inherit from the ToolStrip control and change the renderer. However, the main focus is on implementation rather than diagnosing or resolving technical issues, which limits its alignment with the troubleshooting category.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Azure Boards": {
     "category": "Azure Boards",
@@ -1126,15 +1126,15 @@
   },
   "System Configuration": {
     "category": "System Configuration",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:44",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 5,
     "ai_alignment": 15,
     "ai_depth": 12,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on customising the UI colour scheme for Windows Forms in .NET, which is more related to software development and UI design rather than system configuration. While it does touch on aspects of configuration (like setting a custom renderer), it lacks depth in discussing broader system configuration practices, methodologies, or optimisation strategies. The technical details provided are specific to UI customisation rather than the overall system setup or performance enhancement.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Lean Thinking": {
     "category": "Lean Thinking",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net/index.md

@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /resources/blog/custom-ui-colour-scheme-for-windows-forms-net
 tags:
 - Windows
-- Software Development
 categories: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -64,15 +64,15 @@
   },
   "Code and Complexity": {
     "category": "Code and Complexity",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:29",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 10,
     "ai_alignment": 25,
     "ai_depth": 15,
     "non_ai_confidence": 20,
     "final_score": 31.0,
     "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on implementing a specific feature in a software framework, detailing code examples and implementation strategies. While it touches on aspects of code quality and maintainability through the discussion of factory patterns and inheritance, it lacks a broader exploration of complexity theory or its implications on software architecture. The discussion is more technical and practical rather than theoretical, which limits its alignment with the core themes of the 'Code and Complexity' category.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "DevOps": {
     "category": "DevOps",
@@ -850,15 +850,15 @@
   },
   "Pragmatic Thinking": {
     "category": "Pragmatic Thinking",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:41",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on a technical implementation of a UI adapter within the Composite UI Application Block (CAB). While it does touch on practical problem-solving by discussing two approaches to extend functionality, it lacks a broader discussion on Agile, Scrum, or DevOps principles. The depth of the technical details is significant, but the overall alignment with the core themes of pragmatic thinking is limited, as it does not address adaptability or real-world applications in a project management context.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "MVP": {
     "category": "MVP",
@@ -973,15 +973,15 @@
   },
   "Engineering Excellence": {
     "category": "Engineering Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:15",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 25.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content primarily focuses on implementing a specific feature in a software framework, detailing code and technical solutions. While it touches on aspects of software craftsmanship, such as extending functionality and code reuse, it lacks a broader discussion on engineering excellence principles, best practices, or continuous improvement processes. The depth of discussion is limited to a specific implementation without addressing overarching themes of quality assurance or team collaboration.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Coaching": {
     "category": "Coaching",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-06-22-hinshelm-on-composite-ui-application-block/index.md

@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ aliasesArchive:
 tags:
 - Software Development
 - Practical Techniques and Tooling
-- Technical Mastery
 categories: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-01-cafemsn-prize/index.md

@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /blog/cafemsn-prize
 - /cafemsn-prize
 - /resources/blog/cafemsn-prize
-tags:
-- Miscellaneous
+tags: []
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-02-the-most-usefull-net-tool-on-the-face-of-the-planet/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -316,15 +316,15 @@
   },
   "Products and Books": {
     "category": "Products and Books",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:14",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 25.0,
     "ai_mentions": 10.0,
     "ai_alignment": 20.0,
     "ai_depth": 10.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 22.0,
     "reasoning": "The content briefly mentions a .NET tool, Reflector, but lacks detailed discussion or analysis related to Agile methodologies or DevOps practices. It does not provide insights, reviews, or comparisons that would align with the core themes of the category.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Scrum": {
     "category": "Scrum",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/data.index.classifications.json

@@ -100,15 +100,15 @@
   },
   "News and Reviews": {
     "category": "News and Reviews",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T13:28:09",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 42.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 35.0,
     "ai_depth": 30.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
     "final_score": 39.0,
     "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and its implications for web service projects, which aligns with technology updates. However, it lacks explicit references to industry news or reviews, focusing more on personal evaluation and recommendations. The depth of discussion is moderate, providing insights into WCF's features but not enough to classify it as a comprehensive review or news piece.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Agile Product Operating Model": {
     "category": "Agile Product Operating Model",
@@ -166,15 +166,15 @@
   },
   "Technical Excellence": {
     "category": "Technical Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:12",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and its features, which relates to technical excellence in terms of software development practices. However, it lacks explicit discussions on methodologies like TDD, CI/CD, or modular architecture. The focus is more on the technology itself rather than the engineering practices that enhance agility and quality in software development. While there is some depth in discussing WCF's benefits, it does not sufficiently align with the core themes of technical excellence.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Flow Efficiency": {
     "category": "Flow Efficiency",
@@ -433,15 +433,15 @@
   },
   "Working Software": {
     "category": "Working Software",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-11T10:54:38",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 40.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 10,
     "final_score": 30.0,
     "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Framework (WCF) and its potential benefits for web service projects, which aligns with the concept of working software. However, it lacks explicit discussions on Agile or Scrum principles, and the focus is more on the technology itself rather than on delivering functional software that meets user needs. The depth of discussion is moderate, providing some insights into the features and advantages of WCF, but it does not delve deeply into best practices or customer feedback mechanisms.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Lead Time": {
     "category": "Lead Time",
@@ -973,15 +973,15 @@
   },
   "Engineering Excellence": {
     "category": "Engineering Excellence",
-    "calculated_at": "2025-03-10T15:23:09",
+    "calculated_at": "2025-03-15T07:52:25",
     "ai_confidence": 32.0,
     "ai_mentions": 15.0,
     "ai_alignment": 25.0,
     "ai_depth": 20.0,
     "non_ai_confidence": 0,
     "final_score": 29.0,
     "reasoning": "The content discusses the evaluation of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and its features, which touches on aspects of software craftsmanship and development practices. However, it lacks a direct focus on engineering excellence principles, such as coding standards, testing methodologies, or continuous improvement processes. The discussion is primarily about the technology itself rather than the broader context of engineering excellence, resulting in a low confidence score.",
-    "level": "Quaternary"
+    "level": "Ignored"
   },
   "Coaching": {
     "category": "Coaching",

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-08-09-windows-communication-framework-evaluation/index.md

@@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /blog/windows-communication-framework-evaluation
 - /windows-communication-framework-evaluation
 - /resources/blog/windows-communication-framework-evaluation
-tags:
-- Software Development
-- Windows
+tags: []
 preview: metro-binary-vb-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []
 

site/content/resources/blog/2006/2006-09-08-web-2-0/index.md

@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ aliasesArchive:
 - /blog/web-2-0
 - /web-2-0
 - /resources/blog/web-2-0
-tags:
-- Miscellaneous
+tags: []
 preview: nakedalm-logo-128-link-1-1.png
 categories: []