Skip to content

Release the operator v0.120.0 #3749

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Tracked by #12411
codeboten opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3770
Closed
Tracked by #12411

Release the operator v0.120.0 #3749

codeboten opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3770
Assignees

Comments

@codeboten
Copy link
Contributor

As per open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#12411

@iblancasa
Copy link
Contributor

@yuriolisa you are the next in the release doc.

@thiagogcm
Copy link

collector-contrib 0.120.0 shipped with the new prometheus client (open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#36873)

shouldn't this release match that version as well?
my point is mainly because of the prometheus config in the target allocator (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-operator/blob/main/cmd/otel-allocator/internal/config/config.go)

as the prometheus receiver supports the new scrape configs, one might think the target allocator also does

@swiatekm
Copy link
Contributor

swiatekm commented Mar 5, 2025

collector-contrib 0.120.0 shipped with the new prometheus client (open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#36873)

shouldn't this release match that version as well? my point is mainly because of the prometheus config in the target allocator (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-operator/blob/main/cmd/otel-allocator/internal/config/config.go)

as the prometheus receiver supports the new scrape configs, one might think the target allocator also does

I don't think this is required. The operator defines its level of support for Prometheus features by publishing the prometheus-operator version we're compatible with, and the Prometheus dependency follows from that relationship. We do want to upgrade to the latest versions of these dependencies sooner rather than later, but this shouldn't block the operator release. Especially given that the upgrade is not trivial, and we don't want to break things inadvertently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants