Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Blog Post: Java Metric Systems Compared #4517

Closed
jack-berg opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4512
Closed

New Blog Post: Java Metric Systems Compared #4517

jack-berg opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4512
Labels

Comments

@jack-berg
Copy link
Member

jack-berg commented May 21, 2024

Saw the contribution guide for blog posts after I opened the PR #4512. Opening an issue to follow the guidelines.

  • Title: Java Metric Systems Compared
  • Description: A performance comparison of opentelemetry-java versus other popular java metrics systems. Includes a metrics primer, a breakdown of what all metric systems strive to do, and interesting implementation notes about opentelemetry-java's metrics SDK. Code for the performance comparison is checked into github in a personal repo.
  • Technologies: opentelemetry-java, micrometer, prometheus, jmh (for benchmarking), and OTLP
  • Name of related SIG: Java SIG
  • Name of sponsor: Myself (@jack-berg). The content has also already been reviewed by the other opentelemetry-java maintainer, @jkwatson.
@svrnm
Copy link
Member

svrnm commented May 23, 2024

Thanks for following the process, @jack-berg! Since the blog post comes out of the Java SIG there is no concern from my site to have it. I added @open-telemetry/java-approvers as reviewers to the blog post (although @trask already looked into it) and one of us (@open-telemetry/docs-approvers) will take a look eventually as well.

@svrnm svrnm added the blog label May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants