You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Title: LLM Misinterprets Wind Direction in Real-World Spatial Contexts (Flat 2D Vector Reasoning vs. True Spatial Awareness)
Summary:
Large language models like GPT-4 consistently fail to reason correctly about airflow direction relative to window orientation and user position in physical space. The problem is not a misunderstanding of labels like "north-facing," but a deeper limitation: the model reduces real-world airflow to flat 2D vector alignment and lacks any 3D spatial awareness or physical modeling.
🔍 Problem Description:
When prompted with:
“My window faces north. A southerly wind is blowing. I'm indoors, facing the window.”
The correct human interpretation is:
The wind is blowing from behind the person (south), toward the window (north).
But GPT-4 repeatedly states that:
“The wind is coming from the front,”
as if the “south-to-north” vector automatically aligns with the direction the window faces.
This is not because the model misreads “north-facing” as “wind coming from the north.”
The real issue is that the model applies 2D vector logic only, assuming:
That a window is on the north wall, not floating in open space
That airflow needs to pass through the interior spatial environment
🧱 Core Limitation:
No understanding of building geometry, room layout, or object placement
No concept of observer point-of-view
No spatial alignment between wind origin, person, and window
Treats “wind direction” and “window direction” as abstract 2D arrows, not physical vectors in a 3D world
✅ Example of what the model misses:
A “south wind” means air moves from south to north.
If a person is standing indoors facing a north-facing window, that window is on the north wall, and the wind is approaching the person from behind (from the south).
LLMs don’t understand this. They simply align “north-facing” with “wind toward north” and falsely conclude that the wind hits the user’s face.
🧠 Suggested Direction:
Integrate a spatial frame of reference model tied to indoor/outdoor context
Use scene graphs, CAD/BIM layouts, or geometry grounding
Couple LLMs with 3D simulation modules or hybrid reasoning systems
Incorporate examples that reflect observer perspective + structural orientation
Severity: High
This limitation affects not only physical reasoning but the model’s reliability in any environment where geometry, flow, or orientation matter (e.g., smart homes, robotics, architecture, HVAC).
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Title: LLM Misinterprets Wind Direction in Real-World Spatial Contexts (Flat 2D Vector Reasoning vs. True Spatial Awareness)
Summary:
Large language models like GPT-4 consistently fail to reason correctly about airflow direction relative to window orientation and user position in physical space. The problem is not a misunderstanding of labels like "north-facing," but a deeper limitation: the model reduces real-world airflow to flat 2D vector alignment and lacks any 3D spatial awareness or physical modeling.
🔍 Problem Description:
When prompted with:
The correct human interpretation is:
But GPT-4 repeatedly states that:
This is not because the model misreads “north-facing” as “wind coming from the north.”
The real issue is that the model applies 2D vector logic only, assuming:
It completely ignores:
🧱 Core Limitation:
✅ Example of what the model misses:
A “south wind” means air moves from south to north.
If a person is standing indoors facing a north-facing window, that window is on the north wall, and the wind is approaching the person from behind (from the south).
LLMs don’t understand this. They simply align “north-facing” with “wind toward north” and falsely conclude that the wind hits the user’s face.
🧠 Suggested Direction:
Severity: High
This limitation affects not only physical reasoning but the model’s reliability in any environment where geometry, flow, or orientation matter (e.g., smart homes, robotics, architecture, HVAC).
Tags:
#LLM_Limitation
#Spatial_Reasoning
#Airflow_Misunderstanding
#3D_Context_Missing
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions