You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How to describe rate ratios on sparse practice level measures? Use rate difference? Adjust baseline rates by offset?
[ ] Add analysis of appointment types/statuses and SRO measures to look at changes in proportion rather than rate since the rates are confounded by total appt number -> Do this by adjusting for total no. of appts in a glm, in stats_test.r.
~[ ] How would this differ from restriction to _appts in interval ~
Clustering measures in backlog
Backlog more rigorous pressure evaluation
Further analysis of best measure -> variation between years and within winter -> Variance decomposition?
Further discussion needed
[ ] Stratfication by quintiles of electronic frailty score and 20-comorbidity score
[ ] Practice-stratification (as described in original approval text: "how those pressures may vary by practice characteristics (e.g. list size, staff composition, etc)". -> Practice subgroup analysis #143
A measure that captures pressure with respect to capacity (e.g. propn of max year) as discussed originally here
Potential comorbidity analysis - Number of comorbidities
over time, which would confirm duplication of referral request dates.
The bottom decile of start/seen_in_interval has a very low rate, which is unusual. Only including practices with registrations the whole interval made them non-zero, but its still lower than expected and should be explained.
Consider moving epidemic method approach - For each measure, create average curve across seasons (around each years peak week) and compare current levels to it.
Future service idea: A dashboard kinda thing with a timeseries where one line = weekly average rate and second line = current weekly rate. Can be done at national level, or practice level to allow practices to self-evaluate changes in their measures.
[ ] Add analysis of appointment types/statuses and SRO measures to look at changes in proportion rather than rate since the rates are confounded by total appt number -> Do this by adjusting for total no. of appts in a glm, in stats_test.r.Further discussion needed
[ ] Stratfication by quintiles of electronic frailty score and 20-comorbidity score[ ] Practice-stratification (as described in original approval text: "how those pressures may vary by practice characteristics (e.g. list size, staff composition, etc)".-> Practice subgroup analysis #143over time, which would confirm duplication of referral request dates.