Skip to content

Commit e4cf267

Browse files
committed
Add benchmarking RFC
1 parent d68f24c commit e4cf267

File tree

1 file changed

+22
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+22
-0
lines changed

Diff for: rfcs/20231212-benchmarking-rfc.md

+22
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
1+
# OpenXLA Benchmarking
2+
| Status | Proposed |
3+
| :------------ | :------------------------------------------------------ |
4+
| **RFC #** | [101](https://github.com/openxla/community/pull/101) |
5+
| **Authors** | David Dunleavy ([email protected]) |
6+
| **Sponsor** | Puneith Kaul ([email protected]) |
7+
| **Updated** | 2023-12-12
8+
9+
## Objective
10+
Gather feedback on what benchmarking infrastructure would be helpful for the OpenXLA community.
11+
12+
## Proposal
13+
Previous benchmarking efforts like those described in the
14+
[Benchmarking Strategy RFC](https://github.com/openxla/community/blob/main/rfcs/20230505-benchmarking-strategy.md)
15+
have been disrupted due to changes in broader strategy in the OpenXLA ecosystem.
16+
Since then, there have been some independent discussions about benchmarking for XLA,
17+
but we are interested in getting a pulse on what's most important to the community.
18+
19+
## Questions
20+
What openly available models are most interesting to measure?
21+
Is using models in HLO/StableHLO form sufficient? Or is it preferable to do framework level benchmarks?
22+
What backends/targets/configurations are most important to benchmark? Single vs multi-host?

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)