-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Description
If you look at this comment on Stack Overfow, you'll notice it mentions BufReader<Input> in a <code /> block (used backtick on SO).
Now look at the corresponding entry on browse (question ID: 70462689, Title: Rust: Wrapping a BufRead in Mutex while still implementing BufRead), you'll see that this comment has its <Input> been replaced by an HTMLInputElement.
It seems the <code /> block was ignored in the comment text and whatever the content being, it is considered safe (in Jinja's sense).
Safe to assume this could be exploited by malicious ZIM content, thus the label.
Brought to our attention by https://www.ncsc.nl/
Reactions are currently unavailable