You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the spreadsheet, there is a column for a URL. Most of the ~100 rows have a link to a GitHub repository, with notable exceptions including the Linux kernel, golang, gnupg and git which have a pointer to the homepages (and sigstore, but I think that's an omission)
Does that mean that only the code in those repositories is in scope as critical? What happens if a project splits the "critical to trust" functionality across two or more repositories in the same organization?
For example, for ceph, it sounds like ceph/ceph is in scope, but ceph/ceph-ansible is not. Is that by design? Another example, one project under the powershell organization is powershell/openssh-portable. Is that in scope? And another one is puppetlabs/puppet, would puppetlabs/facter be in scope?
I'm sure there's been a discussion on this somewhere, the comments in the spreadsheet point to this question, and in some cases like Signal, apache and mysql, the links point to the entire organization. I think it would be helpful to have a 1:n relationship between named project and "components of interest", described for example via a normalized name/identifier for the "friendly" project name (1:) and purls for the SCM or other generic release pointers (:n)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the spreadsheet, there is a column for a URL. Most of the ~100 rows have a link to a GitHub repository, with notable exceptions including the Linux kernel,
golang
,gnupg
andgit
which have a pointer to the homepages (andsigstore
, but I think that's an omission)Does that mean that only the code in those repositories is in scope as critical? What happens if a project splits the "critical to trust" functionality across two or more repositories in the same organization?
For example, for
ceph
, it sounds likeceph/ceph
is in scope, butceph/ceph-ansible
is not. Is that by design? Another example, one project under thepowershell
organization ispowershell/openssh-portable
. Is that in scope? And another one ispuppetlabs/puppet
, wouldpuppetlabs/facter
be in scope?I'm sure there's been a discussion on this somewhere, the comments in the spreadsheet point to this question, and in some cases like Signal,
apache
andmysql
, the links point to the entire organization. I think it would be helpful to have a 1:n relationship between named project and "components of interest", described for example via a normalized name/identifier for the "friendly" project name (1:) andpurl
s for the SCM or other generic release pointers (:n)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: