Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Hey @chaoky — good catch! This is actually working as intended because your field has If you do not have Does this make sense? I am going to convert this into a discussion as I don't think there's much we can do here. Let me know what you think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
another possible issue is {
slug: "landing",
fields: [
{
name: "cards",
type: "blocks",
blocks: [cards],
required: true,
},
],
} outputting
instead of
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Bug Report
required fields not being represented properly in the graphql schema
Expected Behavior
Current Behavior
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions