Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The Confluence chapter uses Subst without definition, comment, or forward reference #1019

Open
nrnrnr opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

The Confluence chapter uses Subst without definition, comment, or forward reference #1019

nrnrnr opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jsiek

Comments

@nrnrnr
Copy link

nrnrnr commented Jul 24, 2024

The Subst Γ Δ notation from the Substitution appendix is a great notation, but the Confluence chapter uses it without providing a definition, explanation, or forward reference. It warrants a word, I think.

Ultimately I think the book would be improved by introducing this notation in the DeBruijn chapter.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jsiek jsiek

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nrnrnr @jsiek