Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Crosscat insertmany broken? #123

Closed
axch opened this issue Sep 8, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Crosscat insertmany broken? #123

axch opened this issue Sep 8, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@axch
Copy link
Contributor

axch commented Sep 8, 2015

Taylor tells me that crosscat's implementation of insertmany is likely to be broken, as it does not interact with the crosscat subsample table.
@gregory-marton
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #30?

@riastradh-probcomp
Copy link
Contributor

Not exactly -- this is about Crosscat's implementation of the insertmany API, whereas #30 is about (re)designing the API and/or using it to implement INSERT in BQL.

@fsaad
Copy link
Collaborator

fsaad commented Nov 13, 2017

The insert_many function no longer exists as of 5bf3d2d.

Ticket to implement this feature correctly is: #493

@fsaad fsaad closed this as completed Nov 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@axch @gregory-marton @fsaad @riastradh-probcomp