Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deletion from modelled tables #29

Open
riastradh-probcomp opened this issue Jun 4, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

deletion from modelled tables #29

riastradh-probcomp opened this issue Jun 4, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
language
Milestone
language revision 2

Comments

@riastradh-probcomp
Copy link
Contributor

Need a Crosscat story for this. Also may need a story about non-contiguous row ids.
@riastradh-probcomp riastradh-probcomp changed the title deletion from tables deletion from modelled tables Jun 4, 2015
@riastradh-probcomp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Story about non-contiguous row ids was handled with subsampling and is no longer an issue. Deleting data from modelled tables remains an issue.

@gregory-marton
Copy link
Contributor

At the very least, one can force re-analysis after delete. Question is, how common a use case is this?

@riastradh-probcomp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Forcing re-analysis after delete is not the issue. The issue is that Crosscat's notion of the numbering of rows may change, so all the Crosscat states will cease to make sense for the resulting table data. Whether or not it is a common use case, if one ever wants to do this there will need to be logic that is not there right now.

@gregory-marton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. Sounds like it might be appropriate for a "reanalysis" milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
language
Projects
None yet
Milestone
language revision 2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gregory-marton @riastradh-probcomp