Skip to content

Commit 3ef85e1

Browse files
committed
Document queue and priority order when unblocking concurrency-limited jobs
Closes #237
1 parent a17a08b commit 3ef85e1

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ In this case, if we have a `Box::MovePostingsByContactToDesignatedBoxJob` job en
283283

284284
Note that the `duration` setting depends indirectly on the value for `concurrency_maintenance_interval` that you set for your dispatcher(s), as that'd be the frequency with which blocked jobs are checked and unblocked. In general, you should set `duration` in a way that all your jobs would finish well under that duration and think of the concurrency maintenance task as a failsafe in case something goes wrong.
285285

286+
Jobs are unblocked in order of priority but queue order is not taken into account for unblocking jobs. That means that if you have a group of jobs that share a concurrency group but are in different queues, or jobs of the same class that you enqueue in different queues, the queue order you set for a worker is not taken into account when unblocking blocked ones. The reason is that a job that runs unblocks the next one, and the job itself doesn't know about a particular worker's queue order (you could even have different workers with different queue orders), it can only know about priority. Once blocked jobs are unblocked and available for polling, they'll be picked up by a worker following its queue order.
287+
286288
Finally, failed jobs that are automatically or manually retried work in the same way as new jobs that get enqueued: they get in the queue for gaining the lock, and whenever they get it, they'll be run. It doesn't matter if they had gained the lock already in the past.
287289

288290
## Failed jobs and retries

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)