Skip to content

Commit 5aacc42

Browse files
committed
Rename tweak_add_assign -> add_tweak
We now have a method `add_tweak` on the `SecretKey` and `PublicKey`. We can similarly add a method `add_tweak` that consumes self and returns the tweaked key for the `KeyPair` and `XOnlyPublicKey` types. The justification for doing so is that a local variable that calls `tweak_add_assign` changes in meaning but the identifier remains the same, this leads to cumbersome renaming of the local variable.
1 parent 55048ee commit 5aacc42

File tree

1 file changed

+49
-23
lines changed

1 file changed

+49
-23
lines changed

src/key.rs

+49-23
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -892,6 +892,19 @@ impl KeyPair {
892892
*SecretKey::from_keypair(self).as_ref()
893893
}
894894

895+
/// Tweaks a keypair by adding the given tweak to the secret key and updating the public key
896+
/// accordingly.
897+
#[inline]
898+
#[deprecated(since = "0.23.0", note = "Use add_tweak instead")]
899+
pub fn tweak_add_assign<C: Verification>(
900+
&mut self,
901+
secp: &Secp256k1<C>,
902+
tweak: &Scalar,
903+
) -> Result<(), Error> {
904+
*self = self.add_tweak(secp, tweak)?;
905+
Ok(())
906+
}
907+
895908
/// Tweaks a keypair by adding the given tweak to the secret key and updating the public key
896909
/// accordingly.
897910
///
@@ -913,16 +926,16 @@ impl KeyPair {
913926
/// let tweak = Scalar::random();
914927
///
915928
/// let mut key_pair = KeyPair::new(&secp, &mut thread_rng());
916-
/// key_pair.tweak_add_assign(&secp, &tweak).expect("Improbable to fail with a randomly generated tweak");
929+
/// let tweaked = key_pair.add_tweak(&secp, &tweak).expect("Improbable to fail with a randomly generated tweak");
917930
/// # }
918931
/// ```
919932
// TODO: Add checked implementation
920933
#[inline]
921-
pub fn tweak_add_assign<C: Verification>(
922-
&mut self,
934+
pub fn add_tweak<C: Verification>(
935+
mut self,
923936
secp: &Secp256k1<C>,
924937
tweak: &Scalar,
925-
) -> Result<(), Error> {
938+
) -> Result<KeyPair, Error> {
926939
unsafe {
927940
let err = ffi::secp256k1_keypair_xonly_tweak_add(
928941
secp.ctx,
@@ -933,7 +946,7 @@ impl KeyPair {
933946
return Err(Error::InvalidTweak);
934947
}
935948

936-
Ok(())
949+
Ok(self)
937950
}
938951
}
939952

@@ -1166,12 +1179,24 @@ impl XOnlyPublicKey {
11661179
}
11671180

11681181
/// Tweaks an x-only PublicKey by adding the generator multiplied with the given tweak to it.
1182+
#[deprecated(since = "0.23.0", note = "Use add_tweak instead")]
1183+
pub fn tweak_add_assign<V: Verification>(
1184+
&mut self,
1185+
secp: &Secp256k1<V>,
1186+
tweak: &Scalar,
1187+
) -> Result<Parity, Error> {
1188+
let (tweaked, parity) = self.add_tweak(secp, tweak)?;
1189+
*self = tweaked;
1190+
Ok(parity)
1191+
}
1192+
1193+
/// Tweaks an [`XOnlyPublicKey`] by adding the generator multiplied with the given tweak to it.
11691194
///
11701195
/// # Returns
11711196
///
1172-
/// An opaque type representing the parity of the tweaked key, this should be provided to
1173-
/// `tweak_add_check` which can be used to verify a tweak more efficiently than regenerating
1174-
/// it and checking equality.
1197+
/// The newly tweaked key plus an opaque type representing the parity of the tweaked key, this
1198+
/// should be provided to `tweak_add_check` which can be used to verify a tweak more efficiently
1199+
/// than regenerating it and checking equality.
11751200
///
11761201
/// # Errors
11771202
///
@@ -1181,22 +1206,22 @@ impl XOnlyPublicKey {
11811206
///
11821207
/// ```
11831208
/// # #[cfg(all(feature = "std", feature = "rand-std"))] {
1184-
/// use secp256k1::{Secp256k1, KeyPair, Scalar};
1209+
/// use secp256k1::{Secp256k1, KeyPair, Scalar, XOnlyPublicKey};
11851210
/// use secp256k1::rand::{RngCore, thread_rng};
11861211
///
11871212
/// let secp = Secp256k1::new();
11881213
/// let tweak = Scalar::random();
11891214
///
11901215
/// let mut key_pair = KeyPair::new(&secp, &mut thread_rng());
1191-
/// let (mut public_key, _parity) = key_pair.x_only_public_key();
1192-
/// public_key.tweak_add_assign(&secp, &tweak).expect("Improbable to fail with a randomly generated tweak");
1216+
/// let (xonly, _parity) = key_pair.x_only_public_key();
1217+
/// let tweaked = xonly.add_tweak(&secp, &tweak).expect("Improbable to fail with a randomly generated tweak");
11931218
/// # }
11941219
/// ```
1195-
pub fn tweak_add_assign<V: Verification>(
1196-
&mut self,
1220+
pub fn add_tweak<V: Verification>(
1221+
mut self,
11971222
secp: &Secp256k1<V>,
11981223
tweak: &Scalar,
1199-
) -> Result<Parity, Error> {
1224+
) -> Result<(XOnlyPublicKey, Parity), Error> {
12001225
let mut pk_parity = 0;
12011226
unsafe {
12021227
let mut pubkey = ffi::PublicKey::new();
@@ -1220,7 +1245,8 @@ impl XOnlyPublicKey {
12201245
return Err(Error::InvalidPublicKey);
12211246
}
12221247

1223-
Parity::from_i32(pk_parity).map_err(Into::into)
1248+
let parity = Parity::from_i32(pk_parity)?;
1249+
Ok((self, parity))
12241250
}
12251251
}
12261252

@@ -2051,20 +2077,20 @@ mod test {
20512077
fn test_tweak_add_assign_then_tweak_add_check() {
20522078
let s = Secp256k1::new();
20532079

2080+
// TODO: 10 times is arbitrary, we should test this a _lot_ of times.
20542081
for _ in 0..10 {
20552082
let tweak = Scalar::random();
20562083

2057-
let mut kp = KeyPair::new(&s, &mut thread_rng());
2058-
let (mut pk, _parity) = kp.x_only_public_key();
2084+
let kp = KeyPair::new(&s, &mut thread_rng());
2085+
let (xonly, _) = XOnlyPublicKey::from_keypair(&kp);
20592086

2060-
let orig_pk = pk;
2061-
kp.tweak_add_assign(&s, &tweak).expect("Tweak error");
2062-
let parity = pk.tweak_add_assign(&s, &tweak).expect("Tweak error");
2087+
let tweaked_kp = kp.add_tweak(&s, &tweak).expect("keypair tweak add failed");
2088+
let (tweaked_xonly, parity) = xonly.add_tweak(&s, &tweak).expect("xonly pubkey tweak failed");
20632089

2064-
let (back, _) = XOnlyPublicKey::from_keypair(&kp);
2090+
let (want_tweaked_xonly, _) = XOnlyPublicKey::from_keypair(&tweaked_kp);
20652091

2066-
assert_eq!(back, pk);
2067-
assert!(orig_pk.tweak_add_check(&s, &pk, parity, tweak));
2092+
assert_eq!(tweaked_xonly, want_tweaked_xonly);
2093+
assert!(xonly.tweak_add_check(&s, &tweaked_xonly, parity, tweak));
20682094
}
20692095
}
20702096

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)