Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transfer ownership of accelerometer to libs team? #828

Open
romancardenas opened this issue Mar 22, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Transfer ownership of accelerometer to libs team? #828

romancardenas opened this issue Mar 22, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@romancardenas
Copy link
Contributor

romancardenas commented Mar 22, 2025

Hi!

I think it would be a good idea to transfer ownership of the accelerometer crate to the libs team. This crate is a nice abstraction for accelerometers, which simplifies significantly the code for retrieving the orientation of a device, for instance.

The author is currently no maintaining this project, but is willing to transfer the ownership of the project to keep it updated.

What do you think @rust-embedded/libs ?

@newAM
Copy link
Member

newAM commented Mar 22, 2025

I don't have the time to maintain it at the moment. I'm not even properly keeping up with existing crates under the libs team umbrella :( If somebody else on the libs team has time to maintain it then I'm all for it.

It might be worth starting the discussion in rust-embbeded-community as well.

@romancardenas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good to me! There are a lot of great crates that become unmaintained, and it is a pity. The embedded Rust community may come up with a mechanism to keep them up to date.

I currently only belong to the riscv team, but I volunteer myself to help the libs team maintaining crates such as accelerometer or similar. Probably I'm not eligible to become a team member, but I would be happy being a collaborator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants