-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
compare_method_predicate_entailment is missing implied bounds from higher-ranked GAT #133805
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
A-GATsArea: Generic associated types (GATs)Area: Generic associated types (GATs)A-higher-rankedArea: Higher-ranked things (e.g., lifetimes, types, trait bounds aka HRTBs)Area: Higher-ranked things (e.g., lifetimes, types, trait bounds aka HRTBs)A-implied-boundsArea: Implied bounds / inferred outlives-boundsArea: Implied bounds / inferred outlives-boundsA-trait-systemArea: Trait systemArea: Trait systemC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-typesRelevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-GATsArea: Generic associated types (GATs)Area: Generic associated types (GATs)A-higher-rankedArea: Higher-ranked things (e.g., lifetimes, types, trait bounds aka HRTBs)Area: Higher-ranked things (e.g., lifetimes, types, trait bounds aka HRTBs)A-implied-boundsArea: Implied bounds / inferred outlives-boundsArea: Implied bounds / inferred outlives-boundsA-trait-systemArea: Trait systemArea: Trait systemC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-typesRelevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
I tried this code (from
tests/ui/generic-associated-types/extended/lending_iterator.rs):I expected to see this happen: Pass (probably?)
Instead, this happened: