Skip to content

Commit 92e3b18

Browse files
authored
Add notes from 2025-02-11 (#76)
1 parent ff7abe9 commit 92e3b18

File tree

1 file changed

+28
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+28
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 28 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
1+
# scikit-image Community Call
2+
3+
- **Time:** Tue, 2025-02-11, 18:00 – 19:00 UTC
4+
- **[Join video call via Jitsi](https://meet.evolix.org/skimage-meeting)**
5+
- ~~**[Join video call via Zoom](https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88060567580?pwd=THRpaWFnSFNwK0Fycy9FVk5RYnV5UT09)**~~
6+
- **Notes:** https://hackmd.io/@scientific-python/HJWUBDVNi
7+
- **[scikit-image Community Calendar](https://scientific-python.org/calendars/skimage.ics)**
8+
- **[Archive — Meeting Notes](https://github.com/scikit-image/skimage-archive/tree/main/meeting-notes)**
9+
- **[Code of Conduct](https://scikit-image.org/docs/stable/conduct/code_of_conduct.html)**
10+
11+
**Present:** Lars, ?
12+
13+
## Agenda
14+
15+
- 0.25.2 release
16+
- Last issue [New watershed (in 0.25) does not give same results #7661
17+
](https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/7661)
18+
- Fix in [Don't assign -inf to watershed markers #7702](https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/7702)
19+
- Juan approved, ready to merge?
20+
21+
22+
- [Basic infrastructure for dispatching to a backend #7520](https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/7520)
23+
- Lars approved
24+
- Waiting for at least 1 additional approval and the 0.25.2 release
25+
- Follow-up discussion around approach based on environment variable now in [Enabling backend priority #1](https://github.com/betatim/scikit-image/pull/1)
26+
- https://github.com/rapidsai/cucim/issues/829
27+
- Marianne made some small suggestions, would be easier for Aditi if we made those in another PR to avoid merge conflicts on Aditi's side. Lars will ping her about it.
28+
- Lars to check-in with Jarrod about when to release 0.25.2 and if feature branch is a possiblity

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)