-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Add eip-4337 Account Abstraction implementation #202
Comments
I might do temporary pull request regularly just to have a discussions about the best way to implement this ... |
Yes, this is something I will look into soon. Feel free to open a draft PR - might be helpful. |
@iam-dev @ItsNickBarry there was an ETHDenver submission that combined eip4337 and eip2535. It may be helpful |
@tjvsx I will check it, thanks |
The whole account abstraction world seems to evolve more each day, so I think it may be too early to identify standard implementations. But I thought it was worth sharing this brief attempt at EIP-6900, which extends ERC4337. Ran into some issues that I don't have time to tackle right now, but thought it could be worth checking out for the next deep diver |
I think account abstraction will be my next priority. Thanks @tjvsx, I'll look at your link when I start working on this. |
ERC-4337: Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool
An account abstraction proposal which completely avoids consensus-layer protocol changes, instead relying on higher-layer infrastructure.
Contracts:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: