You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
3e0a992 doc: Clarify comments about endianness after bitcoin#30526 (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a documentation-only change following up on suggestions made in the bitcoin#30526 review.
Motivation for this change is that I was recently reviewing bitcoin#31583, which reminded me how confusing the arithmetic blob code was and made me want to write better comments.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3e0a992
TheCharlatan:
ACK 3e0a992
Sjors:
ACK 3e0a992
BrandonOdiwuor:
LGTM ACK 3e0a992
Tree-SHA512: 90d5582a25a51fc406d83ca6b8c4e5e4d3aee828a0497f4b226b2024ff89e29b9b50d0ae8ddeac6abf2757fe78548d58cf3dd54df4b6d623f634a2106048091d
{RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "hash", "transaction hash including witness data, shown in byte-reversed hex"},
638
638
{RPCResult::Type::ARR, "depends", "array of numbers",
639
639
{
640
640
{RPCResult::Type::NUM, "", "transactions before this one (by 1-based index in 'transactions' list) that must be present in the final block if this one is"},
0 commit comments