You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to build a form that will have the user select a link from another record, and will filter the records available based on the user's selection from a single selection in a previous question.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to be able to set a filter on the records available that is conditional to the saved value from a previous question. So if the user selects that they work for "aCompany", they can choose the location ID for "aCompany: aLocation, aCompany: bLocation, aCompany: cLocation, etc" but if they select that they work for "bCompany", they can choose the location ID for "bCompany: aLocation, bCompany: bLocation, bCompany: cLocation, etc"
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered having a separate question for each company that filters the records based on each company, but that would create separate fields for each company and empty entries for every non-applicable field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm trying to build a form that will have the user select a link from another record, and will filter the records available based on the user's selection from a single selection in a previous question.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to be able to set a filter on the records available that is conditional to the saved value from a previous question. So if the user selects that they work for "aCompany", they can choose the location ID for "aCompany: aLocation, aCompany: bLocation, aCompany: cLocation, etc" but if they select that they work for "bCompany", they can choose the location ID for "bCompany: aLocation, bCompany: bLocation, bCompany: cLocation, etc"
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered having a separate question for each company that filters the records based on each company, but that would create separate fields for each company and empty entries for every non-applicable field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: