Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BE] Process CV's without keyConcepts #27

Open
SrinivasanTarget opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[BE] Process CV's without keyConcepts #27

SrinivasanTarget opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@SrinivasanTarget
Copy link
Contributor

Current Behaviour:
Identify CSV and its TTL File, if the ttl file doesnt have keyConcept then we error and skip processing/harvesting/indexing the folder.

Ask from Roberto:
Can we still process ttl file without keyConcept and just doesnt add/build endpoint the endpoint URL or CV Data into it. (i.e) process only the ttl file.

MVP for Ontopia doesn't need this Scenario so its not a priority for MVP.

@Clou-dia Clou-dia added the question Further information is requested label Nov 2, 2023
@Clou-dia Clou-dia moved this to 📋 Backlog in [schema.gov.it] - issue tracking Nov 2, 2023
@Clou-dia Clou-dia changed the title Process CV's without keyConcepts [BE] Process CV's without keyConcepts Nov 2, 2023
@Clou-dia Clou-dia added da analizzare and removed question Further information is requested labels Nov 2, 2023
@Clou-dia Clou-dia moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🆕 New in [schema.gov.it] - issue tracking Nov 2, 2023
@ioggstream
Copy link
Contributor

When

  1. a vocabulary has no keyConcept

I expect

  • the vocabulary should be harvested and imported in SparQL
  • no REST API is exposed

Instead

  • the vocabulary is skipped

Notes

Rationale:

  • we may want to import foreign vocabularies (e.g., European Commission vocabularies such as Countries, ... )
  • those vocabularies do not have a NDC:keyConcept

Note: the following controlled vocabularies lacks keyConcept:

VocabolariControllati/classifications-for-transparency/transparency-obligation/transparency-obligation-organization.ttl

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants