Missing then_clause

[ahlinc]

[amaanq]

Is this needed? It just seems to me that the body of the if statement that follows after then, maybe a field of 'body' for that can be added instead

[ahlinc]

It's needed because it makes easier to work with a tree when things grouped into own nodes that are at stable offsets in a parent node instead of while having variable length things that been appended on a previous siblings.

Also on 0:7 there shouldn't be a condition field on the ";" token.

[ahlinc]

ts p --scope source.bash -oc - 'if true; false; true; then echo foo; echo bar; echo then; else echo baz; echo flux; echo else; fi'

Above is a more longer example of why parent nodes are needed.
A statement like parent node even needed on the if's condition to group all sequence of commands into one node. Also this will automatically solve the issue of the condition field on the ";" token.

[amaanq]

yeah, makes sense