-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wide Review of 9 July WD of IFT #193
Comments
A11y review requested 10 July 2024 |
Security review requested 10 July 2024 |
Privacy review requested 24 July 2024 |
I18n review requested 24 July 2024 |
Web Perf WG review requested 24 July 2024 |
IETF HTTP WG review requested 24 July 2024 |
Issue raised by IETF HTTP WG: Response to our request for review: |
Privacy review completed and one issue filed: |
Privacy issue resolved |
Reminder to HTTP WG sent 25 Oct 2024 |
Reminder to Web Perf WG sent 25 Oct 2024 |
This meta-issue tracks the wide review of the 9 July Working Draft of IFT
The new draft addresses review feedback from the earlier proposals. There is no longer a Range Request vs Patch Subset choice, and there is no longer any special protocol required. Compared to the earlier proposals, the risks of fingerprinting have been reduced and there should no longer be an impact on CDN caching.
Because this is a substantial rewrite, we have an Explainer. For the same reason, the FPWD review of Patch Subset is now closed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: