We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
During the June 27 2024 "undefined" deep dive discussion, @cookiecrook proposed (ostensibly with WG agreement) expanding every ARIA attribute's characteristics table to include a value for both missing value default and invalid value default. Some states/properties specify an "Implicit Value for Role" which is the missing value default; note that the missing/invalid value defaults don't reflect to IDL as specified for implicit value in the characteristics tables (see 6.3.2 IDL reflection of ARIA attributes).
Per @jnurthen, the table in section 9. Handling Author errors should not be removed because validators rely on it to surface author errors.
Link to documentation: https://w3c.github.io/aria
Does the issue exists in the editors draft (the editors draft is the most recent draft of the specification)?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related: #1110
Sorry, something went wrong.
Also related: #1895
The issue I marked as a duplicate was discussed in today's meeting, and here are the notes: https://www.w3.org/2024/07/25-aria-minutes.html#t05
keithamus
rahimabdi
No branches or pull requests
Describe the change
During the June 27 2024 "undefined" deep dive discussion, @cookiecrook proposed (ostensibly with WG agreement) expanding every ARIA attribute's characteristics table to include a value for both missing value default and invalid value default. Some states/properties specify an "Implicit Value for Role" which is the missing value default; note that the missing/invalid value defaults don't reflect to IDL as specified for implicit value in the characteristics tables (see 6.3.2 IDL reflection of ARIA attributes).
Per @jnurthen, the table in section 9. Handling Author errors should not be removed because validators rely on it to surface author errors.
Link to the version of the specification or documentation you were looking at
Link to documentation: https://w3c.github.io/aria
Does the issue exists in the editors draft (the editors draft is the most recent draft of the specification)?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: