You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a librarian I champion indexing over cataloguing. An item can gave multiple valid index entries
but only one catalogue entry. As a database designer I insist that the right place to put data is where the user first looks for it. That raises issues when the user expects a different collating sequence.
I arrived at the sign-in desk for the 1990 World Science Fiction Convention in "den Haag" (or "The Hague") in "The Netherlands" (or "Holland" or "Nederlands".) I found a small group of confused Americans. They were searching a printed list to find their details, without success. Having dealt with this at work the week before I collected undeserved kudos by pointing out that in The Netherlands the prefix "van" in a surname is not part of the collating sequence so "van Damme" is filed under D and not V. The fact that the number of names in the report is more than the entries in the database is a lesser error than only including either.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[source] (https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-personal-names) [en]
As a librarian I champion indexing over cataloguing. An item can gave multiple valid index entries
but only one catalogue entry. As a database designer I insist that the right place to put data is where the user first looks for it. That raises issues when the user expects a different collating sequence.
I arrived at the sign-in desk for the 1990 World Science Fiction Convention in "den Haag" (or "The Hague") in "The Netherlands" (or "Holland" or "Nederlands".) I found a small group of confused Americans. They were searching a printed list to find their details, without success. Having dealt with this at work the week before I collected undeserved kudos by pointing out that in The Netherlands the prefix "van" in a surname is not part of the collating sequence so "van Damme" is filed under D and not V. The fact that the number of names in the report is more than the entries in the database is a lesser error than only including either.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: