Skip to content

docs(design): agent-config-editing planning workspace - #5733

Draft
mmabrouk wants to merge 29 commits into
release/v0.109.0from
agent-config-editing-plan
Draft

docs(design): agent-config-editing planning workspace#5733
mmabrouk wants to merge 29 commits into
release/v0.109.0from
agent-config-editing-plan

Conversation

@mmabrouk

@mmabrouk mmabrouk commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Start here: BRIEFING.md — a self-contained review document: the goal, the high-level plan, what was done, what was discovered, the implicit decisions (each reversible by a comment), and the six open decisions with recommendations. Comment inline on that file in the Files tab.

This PR carries the design record for the agent-config-editing project: planning workspace, six implementation contracts, three external design-gate reviews, spike reports, and the decisions log. Two implementation slices are already landed on stacked branches on top of this one (runner safety fixes; the agent-written description field), all test suites green.

Answer format for the six decisions, if you prefer chat over comments: 1A 2yes 3B 4no 5no 6yes or "go with your recommendations".

Planning docs (context, plan, status, research index) plus the accepted
research inputs: the RFC, the change-set interface spec, and the runner
lifecycle architecture.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
agenta-documentation Ready Ready Preview Aug 5, 2026 1:57pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 149b33ed-12b8-46ff-817e-fa5722fa19b3

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Both spikes are green. The decisions log records what was accepted from
each spike and the seven product calls still open.
change-set, commit-transaction, read-config (engine-spike);
execution-authorization, workspace-import, adapter-matrix (runner-spike).
The value_from schema conflict is arbitrated; twelve product calls open.
…orded

Strict canonical serializer, multi-source atomicity, honest TOCTOU model,
descendant confinement, harmless-forgery acknowledgement design, canonical
generation payload, text-file import into text fields with diff approval,
four-layer executable permission split.
…ctions; inline marker validated; harness included
… errors, path normalization, selector forgiveness, optional free-text on all tools
…ditions; message derived server-side; invalid_operation split; v3 spike results
…ass match tolerance, uncommittable build kit
…irectives, .agenta-imports rename, folder policy dissolved by @ag.file, v3 assets, codex upstream check
… single-flag kill switch; open-issues log added
…; cross-contract banners updated

@ag.file marker, .agenta-imports root, list selector key with wrapper
forgiveness, per-class match tolerance with length-preserving folds,
derived commit message, split error codes with next-steps, platform-tool
rejection, uniform reopen note, v3 instructions folded in as normative.
…tching (§18.2 with measured corruption examples)
… absolute-path row struck, stale budget notes removed
…st settled; build-mode card gap logged

The {list,key} grammar fixed in every contract example (the old form is
refused by the shipped endpoint), the revision-selector contradiction
resolved on both sides with the implemented equality rule and the
recorded fallback, the on-acceptance list struck through with what
actually happened, and the unsafe pre-review wording in decisions.md
amended with why both halves were unsafe.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant