Skip to content

Ajared/geospatialGraphRAG

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

11 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

geospatialGraphRAG

geospatial Graph RAG system

Integrating geospatial data into the Graph RAG system enhances its capability to handle location-based queries and relationships, which is particularly valuable for applications involving maps, geographic entities, or spatial reasoning (e.g., "find all stores near Abuja" or "which drivers serviced a specific region?"). OpenLink Software’s Virtuoso Universal Server already supports geospatial extensions, making it a natural fit for this addition.

Revised Layer-by-Layer Solution with Geospatial Integration

Layer 1: Remote Storage

Description: "Often called a 'storage grid' or 'cloud storage', with Amazon S3 being a canonical example."

Design Decision: Geospatial data (e.g., GeoJSON files, shapefiles) will be stored alongside other raw data. MinIO remains suitable, as it can handle diverse file formats, including geospatial datasets.

Tool Choice: MinIO Why MinIO? Open-source and S3-compatible, supporting geospatial file storage (e.g., GeoJSON, KML). Integrates with Virtuoso for data ingestion.

Implementation: Create a bucket (e.g., geospatial-data) for GeoJSON files or other spatial datasets. Store raw text data in a separate bucket (e.g., raw-text). Geospatial Addition: No change to the tool, but ensure geospatial files are included in the ingestion pipeline.

Standards: None directly.

Layer 2: Versioning

Description: "How can one or more people-machines manage changes to a stored document?"

Design Decision: Versioning applies to geospatial datasets as well. Git + DVC remains effective, with no need for OpenLink-specific tools. Tool Choice: Git + DVC (Data Version Control) Why? DVC can version large geospatial files (e.g., GeoJSON) stored in MinIO, ensuring reproducibility.

Implementation: Version scripts and configurations in Git. Use DVC to track changes to geospatial datasets in MinIO. Geospatial Addition: No tool change; DVC handles geospatial file versioning seamlessly.

Standards: None directly.

Layer 3: Markdown

Description: "Providing an accepted standard for a format which is both human and machine-readable."

Design Decision: Markdown can include references to geospatial data (e.g., links to GeoJSON files). Pandoc remains the tool of choice. Tool Choice: Pandoc Why Pandoc? Supports Markdown with embedded links to external files (e.g., GeoJSON).

Implementation: Add Markdown annotations referencing geospatial data (e.g., Mars Region Data). Convert to JSON-LD with Pandoc for semantic markup. Geospatial Addition: Embed links or metadata about geospatial files in Markdown.

Standards: Markdown.

Layer 4: Semantic Markup

Description: "Ability to describe the 'links' and metadata within the content, represented in markdown format."

Design Decision: Geospatial data requires semantic markup with spatial properties (e.g., coordinates, geometries). JSON-LD can encode GeoJSON-like structures, and Virtuoso will handle the spatial RDF conversion. Tool Choice: JSON-LD + OpenLink Data Explorer (via Virtuoso) Why JSON-LD? Supports geospatial properties using standards like GeoSPARQL (e.g., geo:asWKT for Well-Known Text). Can embed GeoJSON-like data (e.g., {"@type": "geo:Feature", "geometry": {"type": "Point", "coordinates": [-87.65, 41.84]}}). Why OpenLink Data Explorer? Helps visualize and validate spatial RDF data in Virtuoso.

Implementation: Embed JSON-LD with geospatial metadata in Markdown (e.g., coordinates of Mars landing sites). Use RDFLib to convert JSON-LD to RDF, then load into Virtuoso with spatial extensions enabled. Geospatial Addition: Use GeoSPARQL vocabulary to annotate spatial features (e.g., points, polygons).

Standards: JSON-LD, RDF, GeoSPARQL.

Layer 5: Shared Editing

Description: "Collaborative editing of the content within a shared format, often via 'append-only' log approaches."

Design Decision: Geospatial edits (e.g., updating a region boundary) need to be tracked. Apache Kafka and Git remain suitable. Tool Choice: Apache Kafka + Git Why Apache Kafka? Logs geospatial changes (e.g., new GeoJSON features) in an append-only manner. Why Git? Tracks Markdown files with geospatial references.

Implementation: Use Git for collaborative Markdown edits. Use Kafka to log RDF updates, including spatial triples, into Virtuoso. Geospatial Addition: Ensure Kafka logs include spatial metadata changes.

Standards: None directly.

Layer 6: Shared Vocabulary

Description: "Harmonizing the semantics with popular controlled vocabularies, e.g., DCMI, Schema.org, etc."

Design Decision: The ontology must include geospatial concepts (e.g., geo:Point, geo:Feature). Virtuoso’s ontology support can incorporate GeoSPARQL. Tool Choice: Virtuoso (Ontology Support) + Protégé (optional) Why Virtuoso? Supports OWL, SKOS, and GeoSPARQL for defining spatial vocabularies. Why Protégé (optional)? Useful for initial ontology design with geospatial terms.

Implementation: Extend the ontology with GeoSPARQL classes and properties (e.g., geo:asWKT, geo:sfWithin). Load into Virtuoso and validate using its SPARQL engine. Geospatial Addition: Include GeoSPARQL as part of the shared vocabulary.

Standards: SKOS, OWL, RDFS, RDF, GeoSPARQL.

Layer 7: Persistent Identifiers

Description: "Annotating the content with global unique identifiers that have semantics attached."

Design Decision: Geospatial entities (e.g., a Mars crater) need persistent URIs. Virtuoso handles this effectively. Tool Choice: Virtuoso (URI Management) Why Virtuoso? Generates persistent URIs for geospatial features.

Implementation: Assign URIs to geospatial entities (e.g., http://mygraph.org/feature/MarsCrater1). Ensure URIs include spatial semantics via GeoSPARQL. Geospatial Addition: Link URIs to spatial data (e.g., WKT representations).

Standards: RDF (URIs), GeoSPARQL.

Layer 8: KG-ish Usage

Description: "Where we obtain the benefits of sharing resources, validation, inference, embedding, etc."

Design Decision: Virtuoso’s geospatial extensions enable spatial querying, validation, and inference. This layer becomes the core for geospatial Graph RAG. Tool Choice: Virtuoso Universal Server Why Virtuoso? Includes a geospatial engine supporting Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards (e.g., WKT, WGS84). Supports GeoSPARQL queries (e.g., geo:distance, geo:intersects). Handles RDF storage, inference, and validation with SHACL.

Implementation:

  • Load geospatial RDF data (e.g., geo:asWKT "POINT(-87.65 41.84)"^^geo:wktLiteral) into Virtuoso.
  • Use SHACL to validate spatial constraints (e.g., ensure all geo:Feature has a geo:geometry).
  • Enable Virtuoso’s geospatial inference (e.g., spatial relationships like containment).
  • Write SPARQL queries with GeoSPARQL functions:
  • Example: SELECT ?feature WHERE { ?feature geo:sfWithin ?region . }
  • Use RDF2Vec for embeddings, optionally incorporating spatial features. Geospatial Addition:
  • Store geometries as WKT or GML in RDF triples.
  • Perform spatial queries (e.g., "find all rovers within 100km of a Mars site").
  • Integrate with a geospatial visualization tool like OpenLayers (open-source) for user interfaces.

Standards: SHACL, OWL, RDFS, RDF, GeoSPARQL, OGC standards.

Graph RAG Integration: Retrieve geospatial subgraphs via SPARQL/GeoSPARQL. Feed spatial data into a language model (e.g., Hugging Face) with context (e.g., "rovers near coordinates X, Y").

Layer 9: Publication

Description: "W3C standards grew out of HTTP-ish work; hence Solid, LDP, etc., tend to focus here."

Design Decision: Publish the geospatial graph with dereferenceable URIs. Virtuoso and Solid remain the tools, with geospatial data exposed. Tool Choice: Virtuoso (SPARQL Endpoint) + Solid Server (Community Edition) Why Virtuoso? SPARQL endpoint supports GeoSPARQL, enabling spatial data publication. Why Solid Server? Stores geospatial user data (e.g., custom regions) in Pods.

Implementation:

  • Expose the graph via Virtuoso’s SPARQL endpoint with GeoSPARQL support.
  • Integrate with Solid to publish geospatial datasets as linked data.
  • Ensure URIs (e.g., http://mygraph.org/feature/MarsCrater1) resolve to spatial data.
  • Geospatial Addition: Publish GeoSPARQL-compliant endpoints for spatial queries.
  • Standards: LDP, RDF, SPARQL, GeoSPARQL.
  • Graph RAG Generation:
    • Generate answers incorporating spatial context (e.g., "Rover X explored region Y at coordinates Z").

Graph RAG Workflow with Geospatial

  • Data Ingestion:
    • Store raw and geospatial data (e.g., GeoJSON) in MinIO.
    • Version with Git and DVC.
    • Annotate in Markdown with JSON-LD, including spatial metadata. Graph Construction:
    • Convert JSON-LD to RDF with RDFLib, including GeoSPARQL annotations.
    • Load into Virtuoso with geospatial extensions.
    • Define ontology with GeoSPARQL in Virtuoso.
    • Assign persistent URIs and validate with SHACL. Retrieval:
    • Query via Virtuoso’s SPARQL/GeoSPARQL endpoint (e.g., spatial joins, distance calculations).
    • Use RDF2Vec with spatial features for similarity retrieval.
  • Generation:
    • Feed geospatial subgraphs into a Hugging Face model with spatial context. Publication:
    • Publish via Virtuoso’s endpoint and Solid, with GeoSPARQL support. Geospatial Benefits Spatial Queries: Enable complex queries like "find all features within a polygon." Visualization: Pair with OpenLayers for interactive maps. Reasoning: Infer spatial relationships (e.g., containment, proximity) using GeoSPARQL.

Challenges and Mitigations

  • Greenfield: First Graph + AI project going to prod. Solution is upskilling, peer feedback.
  • Data Complexity: Geospatial data (e.g., large shapefiles) may require preprocessing. Use GDAL (open-source) to convert to GeoJSON/RDF.
  • Performance: Spatial queries on large graphs can be slow. Optimize with Virtuoso’s spatial indexing.
  • Model Integration: Language models may struggle with spatial data. Preprocess spatial results into text (e.g., "near coordinates X, Y") for the model.

About

geospatial Graph RAG system

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published