Skip to content

Remove deps on node-fetch #43277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025
Merged

Remove deps on node-fetch #43277

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

anomiex
Copy link
Contributor

@anomiex anomiex commented Apr 28, 2025

Proposed changes:

Remove deps on node-fetch. Node has native fetch now.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

None

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

No

Testing instructions:

  • Both removed instances are in E2E related code, so are the E2Es happy?

Node has native `fetch` now.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WoA dev site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin (Jetpack or WordPress.com Site Helper), and enable the remove/node-fetch-dep branch.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack remove/node-fetch-dep
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin remove/node-fetch-dep

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Make sure to test your changes on all platforms that it applies to. You're responsible for the quality of the code you ship.
  3. You can use GitHub's Reviewers functionality to request a review.
  4. When it's reviewed and merged, you will be pinged in Slack to deploy the changes to WordPress.com simple once the build is done.

If you have questions about anything, reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: Atomic deploys happen twice daily on weekdays (p9o2xV-2EN-p2)

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

Copy link

Code Coverage Summary

This PR did not change code coverage!

That could be good or bad, depending on the situation. Everything covered before, and still is? Great! Nothing was covered before? Not so great. 🤷

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

@anomiex anomiex requested a review from a team April 28, 2025 20:55
@anomiex anomiex added [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. and removed [Status] In Progress labels Apr 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tbradsha tbradsha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it's been listed as stable in Node since v21. The changes check out.

Copy link
Contributor

@tbradsha tbradsha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noting there's one comment that references node-fetch:

* Mocked out version of node-fetch; allows fetching local resources from the data directory.

@anomiex anomiex merged commit 6ccb327 into trunk Apr 29, 2025
90 checks passed
@anomiex anomiex deleted the remove/node-fetch-dep branch April 29, 2025 14:28
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. label Apr 29, 2025
@anomiex
Copy link
Contributor Author

anomiex commented Apr 29, 2025

Not sure what exactly that's referring to. If it's referring to the node-fetch package, it's left over from before some past refactor that had already removed it. 🤷

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants