-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
Add Dolly CLI bump stats #3559
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gcsecsey
wants to merge
6
commits into
trunk
Choose a base branch
from
gcsecsey/stu-1739-cli-dolly-tracks
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Add Dolly CLI bump stats #3559
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e5d66e9
Add Dolly CLI bump stats
gcsecsey f3e4327
Merge branch 'trunk' into gcsecsey/stu-1739-cli-dolly-tracks
gcsecsey 74bebf6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/trunk' into gcsecsey/stu-1739-cl…
gcsecsey 7522f5c
Merge branch 'trunk' into gcsecsey/stu-1739-cli-dolly-tracks
gcsecsey b513527
Fix Dolly bump stat test type error
gcsecsey e97a2a3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/gcsecsey/stu-1739-cli-dolly-trac…
gcsecsey File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question about naming, are there any other occurrences of
Dolly, if not, should we adopt thewp-agentnaming? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking again about this, I think it's fine to consider Dolly as the internal codename
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about this too, and was wondering if we could just call this feature "Studio remote sessions" maybe. But overall, I think it's fine to keep the internal naming for now, too.