Conversation
|
Hi - thanks for this. We don't actually have an ESP8266 platform to test this with - are you using a particular board / setup that we could duplicate? I agree that using a ctor probably isn't that smart and that the alternative overload method you use is neater (although code as written won't work due to address assignment at line 108 of MPR121.cpp - but I can easily fix that). I don't understand the inversion of the NOT_INITED_BIT though - since it sits in a packed byte of active-high error flags - inverting it seems counterintuitive. |
|
Hi @baruch did you see the last comment on this? |
|
Hi again I can't accept this pull request without being able to test at this end - if you're able to describe your test setup so that I can duplicate and test at this end I can work on approving the request - otherwise, sadly, I shall have to close this PR without merging. Please let me know how you want to proceed. |
|
Just for information: I started to experiment with this library on ESP8266 in February and never had problems with the constructor?! |
|
Thanks for this, @euphi - in your opinion does the library work on the ESP8266 platform? |
|
I wanted to say "yes, no problems", however, when thinking about this, I remember two strange issues:
For an example, see the (quite complex) project https://github.com/euphi/ESP-Touch/tree/Display_WS2812 :
Note: The ESP-Touch project now uses my fork of MPR121 (see PR #8), but the sources are unchanged. During development I used the original library, the fork is only for platformio and travis-ci integration. |
On the ESP8266 Arduino framework the constructor causes a crash, a simple workaround is to eliminate the need for it. The patches I created are an option for that.
I have to admit I didn't fully test the error handling, it's mainly a basis for consideration.