Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates actions/cache from v2 to v4 #553

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MaximeBro
Copy link
Contributor

@MaximeBro MaximeBro commented Jan 13, 2025

Describe your changes

closes #547

Updates actions/cache workflow from v2 to v4.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions cache action from version 2 to version 4 in code quality and E2E test workflows.
    • Added a new step to capture the STORE_PATH environment variable in the E2E test workflow.
    • No functional changes to the existing workflow configurations.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
start-ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 13, 2025 10:11am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflows for code quality and E2E tests by upgrading the actions/cache action from version 2 to version 4. This change is in response to GitHub's announcement about deprecating older versions of the cache action. Additionally, a new step for capturing the pnpm store directory has been added to the E2E tests workflow. The modifications are specifically made in two workflow files: .github/workflows/code-quality.yml and .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml, ensuring compatibility with GitHub's upcoming changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml Updated cache action from actions/cache@v2 to actions/cache@v4
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml Updated cache action from actions/cache@v2 to actions/cache@v4; added new step "Get pnpm store directory"

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update cache action to supported version [#547]
Prevent workflow failures after February 1st, 2025 [#547]

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f1f7c1 and 1941574.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (lts/*)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (22)
  • GitHub Check: Playwright E2E Tests
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (20)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1)

Confirmed: Inconsistent pnpm versions across workflows

  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml uses pnpm v8
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml uses pnpm v9

Align the versions to ensure consistent dependency resolution and build reproducibility across workflows.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 44-48: Align pnpm versions across workflows

There's an inconsistency in pnpm versions:

  • code-quality.yml uses pnpm v8
  • e2e-tests.yml uses pnpm v9

Consider using the same version across all workflows for consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for pnpm version inconsistencies across all workflow files
echo "Checking pnpm versions in workflow files..."
rg -A 2 "pnpm/action-setup@v" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 501


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for pnpm version specifications in workflow files
echo "Checking complete pnpm setup blocks in workflow files..."
rg -A 5 "pnpm/action-setup@v" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 830

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

Line range hint 22-24: Consider upgrading actions/setup-node to v3

While upgrading actions/cache, it would be good to also upgrade actions/setup-node from v2 to v3 for consistency and latest features.

-      - uses: actions/setup-node@v2
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: ${{ matrix.node }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4be5fec and c520a5c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (lts/*)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (22)
  • GitHub Check: Playwright E2E Tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

41-41: LGTM! Successful upgrade to actions/cache@v4

The upgrade from v2 to v4 is correct and follows GitHub's recommendation for using the latest stable version.

.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1)

65-65: LGTM! Successful upgrade to actions/cache@v4

The upgrade from v2 to v4 is correct and follows GitHub's recommendation for using the latest stable version.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1)

63-63: Remove trailing whitespace.

The line contains trailing spaces which should be removed to maintain clean YAML formatting.

-      
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 63-63: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c520a5c and 8f1f7c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml

65-65: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 65: mapping values are not allowed in this context

(syntax-check)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml

[error] 63-63: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 65-65: syntax error: mapping values are not allowed here

(syntax)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (22)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Type Check (20)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml (2)

68-68: LGTM! Good proactive maintenance.

The update to actions/cache@v4 is a good proactive step to stay current with GitHub Actions' supported versions. The cache configuration remains properly structured with appropriate paths and keys.


64-65: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix YAML syntax and consider debug step placement.

  1. The debug step has incorrect YAML syntax. The run key should be properly indented.
  2. While debugging steps are helpful during development, consider if this step should remain in the production workflow.

Fix the YAML syntax:

 - name: Debug STORE_PATH
-        run: echo "STORE_PATH is: ${{ env.STORE_PATH }}"
+   run: echo "STORE_PATH is: ${{ env.STORE_PATH }}"

Consider removing this debug step once the cache configuration is verified to be working correctly.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

65-65: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 65: mapping values are not allowed in this context

(syntax-check)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 65-65: syntax error: mapping values are not allowed here

(syntax)

@MaximeBro MaximeBro force-pushed the fix/actions-cache-update branch from 8f1f7c1 to 1941574 Compare January 13, 2025 10:08
@DecampsRenan DecampsRenan merged commit 9556ef7 into master Jan 13, 2025
9 checks passed
@DecampsRenan DecampsRenan deleted the fix/actions-cache-update branch January 13, 2025 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: update cache
2 participants