Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ensi321
Copy link
Contributor

@ensi321 ensi321 commented Oct 20, 2025

As title

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ensi321, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses several type-related inconsistencies and potential issues within the TreeView and SSZ type implementations for Bool and Uint. The changes ensure correct handling of values in data structures, proper function signatures, and efficient passing of data by reference where appropriate, contributing to the overall robustness and correctness of the SSZ library.

Highlights

  • TreeView changed map update: Corrected the way void values are stored in the changed map within TreeView by using an empty struct {} and handling potential errors with try.
  • Node creation with references: Modified createLeaf calls in BoolType and UintType to pass a reference (&new_leaf) to the new_leaf array, ensuring correct type matching and potentially improving efficiency by avoiding copies.
  • UintType fromValuePacked return type: Updated the fromValuePacked function in UintType to correctly return the Node.Id generated by createLeaf, aligning its signature with its new behavior.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses several critical type-related issues within the TreeView implementation and associated SSZ types. The changes correct compilation errors by ensuring proper values are used for void types, passing pointers where required by function signatures, and aligning function return types with the actual values being returned. These fixes are essential for the correctness and compilability of the code.

@ensi321
Copy link
Contributor Author

ensi321 commented Oct 21, 2025

Too trivial of a change. Incorporated the changes into #79 and #80

@ensi321 ensi321 closed this Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants