Skip to content

fix(windows): remove duplicate strip of datadog-installer.exe#51337

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
branden.clark/installer-symbols
May 27, 2026
Merged

fix(windows): remove duplicate strip of datadog-installer.exe#51337
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
branden.clark/installer-symbols

Conversation

@clarkb7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@clarkb7 clarkb7 commented May 27, 2026

What does this PR do?

Remove the duplicate registration of datadog-installer.exe with windows_symbol_stripping_file in omnibus/config/projects/agent.rb. The binary was registered twice (once via the GO_BINARIES loop, once explicitly below it), so omnibus's Windows stripper ran the cp source target + strip pair twice. The second pass copied the already-stripped binary over the .debug file, leaving the published datadog-installer.exe.debug with no DWARF and no .gopclntab.

Motivation

When triaging a Windows installer hang from an xperf trace, addr2line and go tool addr2line both refused to symbolize installer stacks because the .debug file shipped in datadog-installer-*-x86_64.debug.zip had been stripped of all debug info. agent.exe and other Go binaries were unaffected because they are only listed once in GO_BINARIES.

datadog-installer.exe was registered with windows_symbol_stripping_file
twice: once inside the GO_BINARIES loop and once explicitly below it.
The stripper has no dedup, so it ran the cp-then-strip pair twice; the
second pass copied the already-stripped binary over the .debug file,
leaving the published debug artifact with no DWARF and no .gopclntab.
Result: addr2line and `go tool addr2line` both refused to symbolize
installer stacks from kernel traces / crash dumps.

Remove the duplicate registration. agent.exe and other GO_BINARIES were
unaffected because they are not double-listed.
@clarkb7 clarkb7 added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/windows-products labels May 27, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codex review

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label May 27, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label May 27, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@datadog-prod-us1-5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot commented May 27, 2026

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/datadog-agent | oracle: [21.3.0-xe]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Failed to ping oracle instance: ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.

DataDog/datadog-agent | unit_tests_notify   View in Datadog   GitLab

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Command 'ls junit-tests_*.tgz' failed with exit code 2. Error: No such file or directory.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 925aba1 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 27, 2026

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 221b5f8f:

Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.256.925aba1.pipeline.115394260-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 27, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 221b5f8
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

33 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 746.109 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 703.887 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 310.693 MiB
agent_msi 610.133 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 746.092 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 703.870 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 723.665 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 684.588 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 746.092 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 703.870 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 723.665 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 684.588 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 806.269 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 808.643 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 997.189 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 988.341 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 207.074 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 221.016 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.154 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.499 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.690 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 302.092 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 313.592 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.155 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.280 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.155 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.155 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 44.468 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 41.437 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 42.150 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 44.469 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 44.469 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented May 27, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: e63e1b6d-f387-4502-8929-17e92808cc61

Baseline: a53c978
Comparison: 7880749
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +0.47 [-2.46, +3.41] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +2.52 [+1.51, +3.54] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization +0.73 [+0.69, +0.77] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.60 [+0.41, +0.79] 1 Logs
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +0.47 [-2.46, +3.41] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.47 [+0.22, +0.72] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.36 [+0.12, +0.59] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.16 [+0.01, +0.32] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.04 [-0.12, +0.19] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.36, +0.42] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.19, +0.22] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.09, +0.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.13, +0.12] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.50, +0.48] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.22, +0.18] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.02 [-0.21, +0.17] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.03 [-0.08, +0.02] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.49, +0.39] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.10 [-0.14, -0.06] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.23 [-0.29, -0.16] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization -0.24 [-0.29, -0.19] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.42 [-0.52, -0.32] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.45 [-0.64, -0.27] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization -0.48 [-0.58, -0.37] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 541 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 244.14MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 693 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 143.25MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 741.66KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 471.94MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 176.45MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.41MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 344.71 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 375.09MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@clarkb7 clarkb7 marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 13:06
@clarkb7 clarkb7 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2026 13:06
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 7880749 into main May 27, 2026
465 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the branden.clark/installer-symbols branch May 27, 2026 20:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.81.0 milestone May 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-build team/windows-products

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants