Configure `GeneratePackageVersions` to support a "cooldown" on dependencies by bouwkast · Pull Request #8371 · DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet

bouwkast · 2026-03-25T21:57:19Z

Summary of changes

default cooldown period is 2 days

Adds a configurable cooldown period to the GeneratePackageVersions to support remediation efforts for follow up after #incident-51602.

To use supply the optional parameter --PackageVersionCooldownDays X where X is some number of days. The current period is at the moment is going to be 2 days.

After running the tool a "cooldown" report is generated, this file will contain packages that we see have a newer version, but will not incorporate into the test, the fallback version that falls within the cooldown period is provided. This file content will show up in the output of future test package version bump PRs.

Note that this is for automated updates, so if it sees something already updated it will honor it.

Here's an example output ran locally with 14 days set:

## Package Version Cooldown Report

The following versions were published less than **14 days** ago and have been overridden.
These require manual review before inclusion.

| Package | Integration | Overridden Version | Published | Age (days) | Using Instead |
|---------|-------------|--------------------|-----------|------------|---------------|
| AWSSDK.Core | AwsSdk | 4.0.3.22 | 2026-03-25 | 0 | 4.0.3.21 |
| AWSSDK.S3 | AwsS3 | 4.0.19.2 | 2026-03-25 | 0 | 4.0.19.1 |
| StackExchange.Redis | StackExchangeRedis | 2.12.8 | 2026-03-25 | 0 | 2.12.4 |

Reason for change

In #8364 and #incident-51602 all automated dependency updaters to be disabled temporarily, to re-enable we need to supply a 2 day "cooldown" to any version that we update to (in other words the version of the NuGet must be published for at least 2 days before we can update to it).

Implementation details

I made Claude do this 🤖

NuGetPackageHelper now captures the Published date from IPackageSearchMetadata via a new VersionWithDate record (previously discarded)
NuGetVersionCache stores the new {Version, Published} format
PackageVersionGenerator.ApplyCooldown filters selected versions after LatestMajors/LatestMinors/LatestSpecific selection:
- Versions outside the cooldown window pass through unchanged
- Versions at or below the baseline (derived from supported_versions.json MaxVersionTestedInclusive) are kept even if
  within cooldown -- no downgrades
- Versions above the baseline and within cooldown are overridden to the best available fallback
CooldownReport collects overridden versions and renders a markdown table saved to tracer/build/cooldown_report.md
The GitHub Actions workflow reads the report and appends it to the auto-bump PR body
Honeypot IntegrationGroups.cs fixes: MSTest.TestFramework now maps to itself, Hangfire.Core maps to Hangfire.Core (was Hangfire), OpenFeature mapping moved to Datadog.FeatureFlags.OpenFeature

Test coverage

I ran GeneratePackageVersions --PackageVersionCooldownDays 14 locally seems good enough IMO (also ran without, with different days etc)

[WRN] GeneratePackageVersi: 3 package version(s) were excluded due to the 14-day cooldown period
[WRN] GeneratePackageVersi:   AWSSDK.Core 4.0.3.22 overridden (published 2026-03-25, using: 4.0.3.21)
[WRN] GeneratePackageVersi:   AWSSDK.S3 4.0.19.2 overridden (published 2026-03-25, using: 4.0.19.1)
[WRN] GeneratePackageVersi:   StackExchange.Redis 2.12.8 overridden (published 2026-03-25, using: 2.12.4)

Other details

The workflow file (auto_bump_test_package_versions.yml) will be re-enabled with this PR

pr-commenter · 2026-03-25T22:41:05Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-03-27 21:03:59

Comparing candidate commit c71f249 in PR branch steven/package-version-release-date-support with baseline commit 5ff69b3 in branch master.

Found 6 performance improvements and 15 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 249 metrics, 18 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

🟩 execution_time [-22.107ms; -21.702ms] or [-9.997%; -9.814%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+83.766ms; +83.858ms] or [+67.190%; +67.264%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+92.791ms; +92.941ms] or [+82.296%; +82.430%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+11.980ms; +17.283ms] or [+5.985%; +8.634%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

🟥 throughput [-84194.796op/s; -58207.498op/s] or [-8.978%; -6.207%]
🟩 execution_time [-21.749ms; -16.301ms] or [-10.134%; -7.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+15.960ms; +21.929ms] or [+8.036%; +11.041%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+13.465ms; +16.935ms] or [+6.747%; +8.486%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+18.708ms; +24.451ms] or [+9.544%; +12.474%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+24.182ms; +24.987ms] or [+13.531%; +13.981%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+28.808ms; +33.811ms] or [+15.676%; +18.398%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 throughput [-288.651op/s; -209.503op/s] or [-17.996%; -13.062%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

🟥 throughput [-187.084op/s; -137.220op/s] or [-35.496%; -26.035%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

🟩 throughput [+49.869op/s; +60.346op/s] or [+5.273%; +6.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+12.096ms; +15.791ms] or [+6.259%; +8.170%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

🟩 allocated_mem [-18.685KB; -18.651KB] or [-6.734%; -6.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+13.575ms; +19.421ms] or [+7.263%; +10.391%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+12.626ms; +15.935ms] or [+6.766%; +8.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-38.294ms; -36.524ms] or [-19.391%; -18.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+16.381ms; +21.470ms] or [+8.479%; +11.113%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-20.477ms; -15.516ms] or [-9.407%; -7.128%]

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot · 2026-03-25T22:48:52Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8371) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	71.60 ± (71.61 - 71.90) ms	71.74 ± (71.86 - 72.15) ms	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	76.15 ± (76.08 - 76.42) ms	76.19 ± (76.08 - 76.46) ms	+0.0%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1075.10 ± (1076.27 - 1082.46) ms	1075.59 ± (1075.58 - 1083.65) ms	+0.0%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	22.41 ± (22.37 - 22.44) ms	22.43 ± (22.38 - 22.47) ms	+0.1%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	83.43 ± (83.24 - 83.63) ms	84.01 ± (83.78 - 84.24) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB	10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	12 ± (12 - 12)	12 ± (12 - 12)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	22.34 ± (22.31 - 22.38) ms	22.33 ± (22.30 - 22.36) ms	-0.1%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	84.90 ± (84.70 - 85.09) ms	85.19 ± (84.98 - 85.39) ms	+0.3%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB	10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	13 ± (13 - 13)	13 ± (13 - 13)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	226.35 ± (225.06 - 227.65) ms	224.05 ± (222.83 - 225.27) ms	-1.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	534.46 ± (533.37 - 535.55) ms	533.03 ± (531.97 - 534.08) ms	-0.3%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	48.26 ± (48.23 - 48.29) MB	48.24 ± (48.21 - 48.27) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	-0.3%	✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	21.14 ± (21.10 - 21.17) ms	20.96 ± (20.93 - 21.00) ms	-0.8%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	72.06 ± (71.88 - 72.23) ms	71.95 ± (71.78 - 72.12) ms	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.65 ± (10.65 - 10.65) MB	10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	21.05 ± (21.01 - 21.09) ms	21.01 ± (20.97 - 21.05) ms	-0.2%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	73.27 ± (73.11 - 73.43) ms	73.11 ± (72.94 - 73.28) ms	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB	10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.75) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	216.21 ± (214.65 - 217.77) ms	213.33 ± (212.13 - 214.53) ms	-1.3%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	530.28 ± (528.80 - 531.77) ms	534.75 ± (533.58 - 535.92) ms	+0.8%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	50.05 ± (50.02 - 50.09) MB	50.18 ± (50.15 - 50.20) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	29 ± (29 - 29)	29 ± (29 - 29)	-0.4%	✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	19.26 ± (19.22 - 19.29) ms	19.31 ± (19.27 - 19.34) ms	+0.2%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	71.75 ± (71.61 - 71.89) ms	71.86 ± (71.69 - 72.03) ms	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.69 ± (7.69 - 7.70) MB	7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	19.22 ± (19.18 - 19.26) ms	19.39 ± (19.36 - 19.42) ms	+0.9%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	72.84 ± (72.67 - 73.02) ms	73.28 ± (73.10 - 73.46) ms	+0.6%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.77 ± (7.76 - 7.78) MB	7.77 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	161.44 ± (160.71 - 162.16) ms	159.89 ± (159.08 - 160.69) ms	-1.0%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	492.12 ± (491.14 - 493.10) ms	493.22 ± (492.05 - 494.38) ms	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	36.98 ± (36.96 - 37.00) MB	36.90 ± (36.88 - 36.93) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	+0.1%	✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	220.50 ± (221.00 - 223.02) ms	217.52 ± (216.96 - 218.86) ms	-1.3%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	224.21 ± (224.51 - 226.46) ms	225.44 ± (225.39 - 227.68) ms	+0.5%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1257.56 ± (1255.96 - 1263.72) ms	1256.77 ± (1257.75 - 1264.76) ms	-0.1%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	213.62 ± (212.96 - 214.28) ms	214.29 ± (213.45 - 215.13) ms	+0.3%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	91.72 ± (91.46 - 91.98) ms	91.53 ± (91.22 - 91.85) ms	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	15.88 ± (15.86 - 15.89) MB	15.87 ± (15.85 - 15.88) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	-0.1%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	212.33 ± (211.71 - 212.95) ms	214.36 ± (213.52 - 215.20) ms	+1.0%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	93.12 ± (92.87 - 93.37) ms	92.81 ± (92.53 - 93.09) ms	-0.3%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	15.89 ± (15.88 - 15.90) MB	15.97 ± (15.96 - 15.99) MB	+0.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	21 ± (21 - 21)	21 ± (21 - 21)	+0.4%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	425.69 ± (424.33 - 427.04) ms	423.99 ± (422.46 - 425.52) ms	-0.4%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	572.04 ± (570.79 - 573.29) ms	570.10 ± (568.73 - 571.47) ms	-0.3%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	59.15 ± (59.11 - 59.19) MB	59.07 ± (59.02 - 59.12) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	-0.3%	✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	217.34 ± (216.73 - 217.96) ms	221.76 ± (220.59 - 222.92) ms	+2.0%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	79.15 ± (78.93 - 79.37) ms	79.66 ± (79.36 - 79.97) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.20) MB	16.16 ± (16.15 - 16.18) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (19 - 20)	20 ± (19 - 20)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	216.30 ± (215.71 - 216.88) ms	222.16 ± (221.14 - 223.18) ms	+2.7%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	80.30 ± (80.08 - 80.52) ms	81.53 ± (81.25 - 81.80) ms	+1.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.14 ± (16.12 - 16.15) MB	16.17 ± (16.16 - 16.19) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	21 ± (20 - 21)	21 ± (21 - 21)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	454.40 ± (452.58 - 456.22) ms	457.50 ± (454.17 - 460.82) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	576.04 ± (574.70 - 577.38) ms	575.48 ± (574.16 - 576.80) ms	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	60.54 ± (60.45 - 60.63) MB	60.59 ± (60.51 - 60.68) MB	+0.1%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	31 ± (31 - 31)	31 ± (31 - 31)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	215.74 ± (214.91 - 216.56) ms	222.71 ± (221.37 - 224.04) ms	+3.2%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	78.03 ± (77.80 - 78.25) ms	78.76 ± (78.49 - 79.02) ms	+0.9%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.45 ± (11.44 - 11.47) MB	11.45 ± (11.43 - 11.47) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	19 ± (19 - 19)	19 ± (19 - 19)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	225.18 ± (223.71 - 226.65) ms	216.34 ± (215.30 - 217.38) ms	-3.9%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	80.78 ± (80.50 - 81.06) ms	79.57 ± (79.36 - 79.79) ms	-1.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.42 ± (11.41 - 11.44) MB	11.50 ± (11.48 - 11.51) MB	+0.6%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	478.06 ± (476.50 - 479.62) ms	474.91 ± (471.85 - 477.98) ms	-0.7%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	534.79 ± (533.53 - 536.05) ms	532.07 ± (530.90 - 533.24) ms	-0.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	-0.4%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	50.77 ± (50.73 - 50.82) MB	50.71 ± (50.65 - 50.76) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	+0.1%	✅⬆️

Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts

FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (72ms)  : 70, 74
    master - mean (72ms)  : 70, 74

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 79
    master - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (1,080ms)  : 1022, 1137
    master - mean (1,079ms)  : 1035, 1123

FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (113ms)  : 109, 117
    master - mean (113ms)  : 109, 116

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117
    master - mean (114ms)  : 111, 116

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (795ms)  : 779, 812
    master - mean (798ms)  : 772, 824

FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 98, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (788ms)  : 768, 808
    master - mean (784ms)  : 765, 803

FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (99ms)  : 95, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 104
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (695ms)  : 682, 709
    master - mean (691ms)  : 666, 716

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (218ms)  : 203, 233
    master - mean (222ms)  : 207, 237

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (227ms)  : 210, 243
    master - mean (225ms)  : 210, 240

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (1,261ms)  : 1212, 1311
    master - mean (1,260ms)  : 1202, 1317

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (316ms)  : 302, 330
    master - mean (315ms)  : 304, 326

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (317ms)  : 300, 334
    master - mean (315ms)  : 303, 327

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (1,037ms)  : 1005, 1068
    master - mean (1,037ms)  : 999, 1075

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (312ms)  : 291, 333
    master - mean (306ms)  : 294, 318

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (313ms)  : 292, 335
    master - mean (306ms)  : 295, 318

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (1,073ms)  : 1012, 1133
    master - mean (1,071ms)  : 1033, 1109

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8371) - mean (313ms)  : 292, 334
    master - mean (305ms)  : 291, 318

    section Bailout
    This PR (8371) - mean (308ms)  : 287, 328
    master - mean (317ms)  : 292, 342

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8371) - mean (1,041ms)  : 977, 1106
    master - mean (1,050ms)  : 1007, 1094

andrewlock · 2026-03-26T17:02:06Z

tracer/dependabot/integrations/Datadog.Dependabot.Hangfire.Core.csproj

This change seems weird 🤔

Isn't it "Hangfire.Core" and not "Hangfire" I couldn't get it to honor the cooldown as the NuGet name was wrong

.gitignore

andrewlock · 2026-03-26T17:03:12Z

tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests/PackageVersionsLatestSpecific.g.cs

                new object[] { string.Empty },
 #else
 #if NET48
-                new object[] { "1.5.14" },


That's weird 😅

tracer/build/_build/GeneratePackageVersions/NuGetVersionCache.cs

tracer/build/_build/GeneratePackageVersions/PackageVersionGenerator.cs

andrewlock

I'm just wondering, would it be easiest to just filter at the source when we load from NuGet? 🤔 and then everything else filters through. I guess you're trying to make it stable, but if we just forced 48 hours always then it would always be stable 🤷‍♂️ Not worried either way, just a thought 😄

andrewlock · 2026-03-26T17:07:33Z

tracer/build/_build/Honeypot/IntegrationGroups.cs

            NugetPackages.Add("Microsoft.VisualStudio.TraceDataCollector", Array.Empty<string>());
            NugetPackages.Add("Microsoft.TestPlatform.CrossPlatEngine", Array.Empty<string>());
-            NugetPackages.Add("MSTest.TestFramework", Array.Empty<string>());
+            NugetPackages.Add("MSTest.TestFramework", new [] { "MSTest.TestFramework" });


Wait, what are these even for again? 😅 do we need them in the manual instrumentation ones too?

So the issue is that the ones I had to update here were all getting around as the "name"/"key" for them all comes from various locations and there are several disconnects, probably could do with a refactoring somewhere to make sure the names and keys all are consistent amongst all files somehow

If that answers it

tracer/build/_build/Build.Utilities.cs

Comes with a 2 day cooldown

bouwkast added the AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos label Mar 25, 2026

bouwkast force-pushed the steven/package-version-release-date-support branch from 84b9b6e to 545f246 Compare March 26, 2026 15:01

bouwkast marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 16:09

bouwkast requested review from a team as code owners March 26, 2026 16:09

andrewlock reviewed Mar 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

andrewlock reviewed Mar 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

tracer/build/_build/GeneratePackageVersions/NuGetVersionCache.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

andrewlock reviewed Mar 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

tracer/build/_build/GeneratePackageVersions/NuGetVersionCache.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

andrewlock reviewed Mar 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

tracer/build/_build/GeneratePackageVersions/PackageVersionGenerator.cs Show resolved Hide resolved

andrewlock approved these changes Mar 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

bouwkast added 7 commits March 27, 2026 13:38

Configure package version update with delay

553c11c

Update nuget_version_cache

ba6e3a8

Run GeneratePackageVersions

98af288

Fix to add OpenFeature to udpater

48131da

Decrease default cooldown period to 2 days

f194451

Re-enable the auto_bump_test_package_versions

a976fcc

Comes with a 2 day cooldown

Address PR comments

c71f249

bouwkast force-pushed the steven/package-version-release-date-support branch from c4c28ec to c71f249 Compare March 27, 2026 17:38

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Configure `GeneratePackageVersions` to support a "cooldown" on dependencies#8371

Configure `GeneratePackageVersions` to support a "cooldown" on dependencies#8371
bouwkast wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
steven/package-version-release-date-support

bouwkast commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Uh oh!

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

FakeDbCommand

HttpMessageHandler

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Uh oh!

bouwkast Mar 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

andrewlock left a comment

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Uh oh!

bouwkast Mar 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

bouwkast commented Mar 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

Uh oh!

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Mar 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

FakeDbCommand

HttpMessageHandler

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bouwkast Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

andrewlock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

andrewlock Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bouwkast Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

bouwkast commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Mar 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading