Skip to content

enh: clarify CF metadata scope in GeoZarr mini-spec and update attribute definitions#133

Open
emmanuelmathot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
minispec-v1-2
Open

enh: clarify CF metadata scope in GeoZarr mini-spec and update attribute definitions#133
emmanuelmathot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
minispec-v1-2

Conversation

@emmanuelmathot
Copy link
Contributor

Clarify the relationship between CF metadata and the GeoZarr specification, emphasizing that CF metadata is not required but can coexist with Zarr conventions. Update attribute definitions for consistency and clarity.

Follows-up on #129

### Attributes

There are no required attributes for Datasets. To qualify as a GeoZarr Dataset, the group must carry geospatial metadata via the `proj:` and `spatial:` conventions declared in its `zarr_conventions` attribute.
There are no required attributes for Datasets. To qualify as a GeoZarr Dataset, the group must carry geospatial metadata via the `proj:` and `spatial:` conventions declared in its `zarr_conventions` key.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is still a bit confusing -- aren't we saying that a geozarr dataset MUST have proj and spatial conventions declared in attributes?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
There are no required attributes for Datasets. To qualify as a GeoZarr Dataset, the group must carry geospatial metadata via the `proj:` and `spatial:` conventions declared in its `zarr_conventions` key.
To qualify as a GeoZarr Dataset, the group must carry geospatial metadata via the `proj:` and `spatial:` conventions declared in its `zarr_conventions` attribute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants