Skip to content

Transfer biophysical variables for output with FATES dimensions#3760

Open
glemieux wants to merge 5 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
glemieux:fates-biophys-by-landuse
Open

Transfer biophysical variables for output with FATES dimensions#3760
glemieux wants to merge 5 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
glemieux:fates-biophys-by-landuse

Conversation

@glemieux
Copy link
Collaborator

@glemieux glemieux commented Feb 13, 2026

Description of changes

This pull request updates the high frequency wrapper procedure in the interface to pass biophysical CLM variables to be output along FATES dimensions. The FATES land use x pft dimension is also added to the history module.

This pull request integration needs to be coordinated with NGEET/fates#1536.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @ckoven

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)?

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so?

Testing performed, if any:
(List what testing you did to show your changes worked as expected)
(This can be manual testing or running of the different test suites)
(Documentation on system testing is here: https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/System-Testing-Guide)
(aux_clm on derecho for intel/gnu and izumi for intel/gnu/nag/nvhpc is the standard for tags on master)

NOTE: Be sure to check your coding style against the standard
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/CTSM-coding-guidelines) and review
the list of common problems to watch out for
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/List-of-common-problems).

@glemieux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fates regression testing of NGEET/fates#1536 is complete and B4B. Aside from updating the Changelog and the fates tag and commit, this is good to review.

@glemieux glemieux requested a review from rgknox February 24, 2026 00:41
@glemieux glemieux moved this from Finding Reviewers to Under Review in FATES Pull Request Planning and Status Feb 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants