Repository navigation
macro again - #312
Open
lazarusA wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
macro again#312lazarusA wants to merge 2 commits into
lazarusA wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
📚 Documentation preview 🚀Preview URL: https://EarthyScience.github.io/EasyHybrid.jl/previews/PR312/ Note The preview will be available once the documentation build completes successfully, and will reflect the last successful build for this PR. |
Collaborator
|
The question is a bit for me: what does it bring us? For me, it looks like it is basically something where everything is a keyword argument, but I don't quite see the point of replicating constructHybrid but with kwargs? |
Collaborator
|
Let's discuss in an EasyHybrid devs meeting |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #303
@BernhardAhrens what do you think about the syntax?
old behaviour is still in, this is just a new feature.